Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Biden eyes options to curb migration

President explores executive actions

- ZEKE MILLER AND SEUNG MIN KIM Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Lindsey Whitehurst and Colleen Long of The Associated Press.

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden told the nation’s governors on Friday that he’s exploring what executive actions he can take to curb migration across the southern border after a bipartisan deal collapsed in Congress this month. He indicated frustratio­n at the legal limits of his authority to act unilateral­ly.

Biden hosted members of the National Governors Associatio­n in the East Room, where he implored them to urge their representa­tives in Congress to resurrect the bipartisan proposal that collapsed within 48 hours. He also sharply criticized Republican­s for backing away from the agreement after former President Donald Trump lobbied in opposition to the deal.

“Over time, our laws and our resources haven’t kept up with our immigratio­n system and it’s broken,” Biden told the governors, lamenting that “petty politics intervened” to kill the deal.

Later, during a private question-and-answer session with the governors, he indicated he was looking at what his options are for doing something by executive order.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, the Republican chair of the associatio­n, told reporters later that Biden didn’t specify what actions he is considerin­g, but he said the president noted that he was confrontin­g the limits of what he can do without Congress.

“He did say that he has been working with his attorneys, trying to understand what executive action would be upheld in the courts and would be constituti­onal, and that he seemed a little frustrated that he was not getting answers from attorneys that he felt he could take the kind of actions that he wanted to,” Cox said.

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, Democratic vice-chair of the governors’ group, said governors got a “general sense that they’re looking into whatever they can do on the executive side. Again, keeping our expectatio­ns realistic, that’s going to be more limited than a congressio­nal solution.”

Polis said Biden cited federal courts overruling some of Trump’s immigratio­n actions, and a desire to avoid a similar fate with any action he took.

“And so there was a frustratio­n that that would occur under under his leadership as well, under any president, absent a change in the law,” Polis said. “A lot of the steps we need to take simply aren’t legal under current law.”

Cox added that Biden mentioned declaring an emergency at the border, which in theory could unlock additional federal funds that would be needed to execute any new border crackdowns.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declined to comment on private conversati­ons.

Among the actions under considerat­ion by Biden is invoking authoritie­s outlined in Section 212(f) of the Immigratio­n and Nationalit­y Act, which gives a president broad leeway to block entry of certain immigrants into the United States if it would be “detrimenta­l” to the national interest.

Trump, the likely GOP candidate to face off against Biden this fall, repeatedly leaned on the 212(f) power while in office, including his contentiou­s ban on travelers from Muslim-majority nations. Biden rescinded that ban on his first day in office through executive order.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States