Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

California­ns knead answers

-

Even before Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the landmark law that would increase the minimum wage for fastfood workers to $20 per hour starting in April, there were some eyebrows raised over the so-called Panera exemption.

The law was designed to boost pay and improve working conditions for employees of fast-food chain restaurant­s, but it contained an oddly specific carve-out: It wouldn’t apply to restaurant­s that bake and sell bread as a stand-alone item on the menu.

Now, Bloomberg reports that Newsom pushed behind the scenes for the exemption, which will benefit billionair­e Greg Flynn, a campaign donor and business associate who owns two dozen Panera Bread locations in the state.

Flynn runs one of the world’s largest restaurant franchise operations and was a vocal opponent of the law, which sets a fast-food worker wage and creates a Fast Food Council that would hike pay in future years and develop labor, health and safety standards for the covered restaurant­s.

Flynn, who attended the same high school as Newsom, contribute­d $160,000 combined to the governor’s 2021 anti-recall campaign and his 2022 re-election. That’s a lot of dough.

When questioned about the bread exemption last year, Newsom dismissed it as “part of the sausage-making” of politics. On Thursday, amid rising outrage, Newsom’s office put out a statement calling the Bloomberg story “absurd” and suggesting Panera is not exempt from the law because it mixes the dough at an off-site location and only bakes and sells the bread at the restaurant.

OK, but we’re going to need some proof. Because the carve-out for bakeries has been reported numerous times using Panera as the example of a restaurant that would benefit from the exemption. The governor’s office has yet to explain publicly why the bakery exemption was even warranted.

Newsom and legislativ­e leaders need to explain themselves. This sounds exactly like the kind of legislativ­e shenanigan­s that undermine public confidence.

It’s difficult to imagine how this could be justified. How does it make sense that, if a restaurant bakes bread for sandwiches, its workers deserve $20 an hour, but if it sells it as a loaf, its workers don’t?

If you were thinking, well, why doesn’t McDonald’s just start selling the McBaguette in California to avoid the law? The exemption applies only to restaurant­s that operate on-site bakeries as of Sept. 15, 2023.

This idea is so crumby it could have risen only in Sacramento.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States