Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Royals, Chiefs mull over future after tax vote fails

- DAVE SKRETTA

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Royals owner John Sherman and Chiefs president Mark Donovan stood on a small stage in the second-floor lounge of the historic J. Rieger & Co. distillery in Kansas City on Tuesday night, acknowledg­ing the will of voters who had rejected a sales tax initiative that would have helped pay for a new downtown ballpark and renovation­s to Arrowhead Stadium.

“Won a baseball game tonight,” said Sherman, whose Royals had beaten the Orioles, “but we didn’t win this.”

The ballot measure didn’t just lose, though. It lost decisively.

More than 58% of voters in Jackson County, Mo., rejected the three-eighths of a cent sales tax. The Royals, who had promised $1 billion in private funding, wanted to use their share of the tax revenue to build a new ballpark as the centerpiec­e of a $2 billion-plus downtown district in a thriving arts neighborho­od known as the Crossroads. The Chiefs, who had committed $300 million from their ownership, wanted to use their share for an $800 million renovation of Arrowhead Stadium.

“We will look to do what is in the best interest of our fans and organizati­on as we move forward,” Donovan said Tuesday night.

Sherman and Donovan then walked off the stage and out a back door, leaving what had been an upbeat and festive watch party without taking questions, yet leaving many questions to be answered in the days and months ahead.

WHY DID THE TAX FAIL?

There was no single reason the tax failed; rather an accumulati­on of factors soured voters. Among them were the location of the downtown ballpark, the messaging from the franchises and the very nature of their constructi­on plans.

Last fall, the Royals floated ballpark concepts east of downtown and in neighborin­g Clay County, Mo., and said they would decide by September on one of the sites. But that self-imposed deadline passed, and it wasn’t until February that the club said it would move instead to the Crossroads, leaving less than two months to sway voters on the location.

Yet the Royals experience­d serious pushback from business owners in the area, some of whom would have had to sell their property and relocate. Compoundin­g the problem was the lack of concrete plans — the Royals could not even produce a current ballpark rendering by Tuesday night after agreeing last week to keep open a street in the stadium footprint. That was just the start of messaging problems that plagued the campaign.

Along with lacking transparen­cy, the Royals and Chiefs shifted their approach at the insistence of political strategist­s running a committee to keep the teams in Jackson County. Their once-positive and collaborat­ive messages were replaced by veiled threats that they would leave if the tax failed, and the “vote yes-or-else” message turned many voters away.

WHAT IS NEXT?

The Chiefs and Royals have said they would explore all options if the tax failed. And while they could still agree to a revised deal with Jackson County, they also could be courted by locales offering tax breaks and other financial benefits.

Officials in Kansas have not been shy about trying to woo the Chiefs across the state line, possibly to an area that includes Kansas Speedway and Children’s Mercy Park, the home of MLS club Sporting Kansas City. Meanwhile, cities such as Nashville that desire a big league ballclub could promise the Royals the funding they desire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States