Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

City attorney for LR faults utility merger

Memo on Wrightsvil­le plan says move lacks legal basis

- JOSEPH FLAHERTY

Central Arkansas Water’s merger with the wastewater treatment system in the city of Wrightsvil­le lacks a legal basis, Little Rock City Attorney Tom Carpenter said in a recent memorandum circulated to city leaders.

The consolidat­ion plan came about after state environmen­tal regulators approached Central Arkansas Water in 2022 about the possibilit­y of the Little Rock-area drinking water utility lending support to the troubled Wrightsvil­le system.

Central Arkansas Water is a regional water utility created in 2001 as a result of an agreement between the cities of Little Rock and North Little Rock. It already provides drinking water to the Wrightsvil­le area.

Most of the daily flow to the Wrightsvil­le wastewater treatment plant comes from the Wrightsvil­le Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction­s. The treatment plant also receives wastewater from a separate collection system to the north.

Central Arkansas Water’s board of commission­ers as well as the Wrightsvil­le City Council approved consolidat­ion measures last year.

To run the Wrightsvil­le system, Central Arkansas Water has sought the assistance of Little Rock’s municipal wastewater utility, known as the Little Rock Water Reclamatio­n Authority.

According to the plan, Central Arkansas Water would operate the Wrightsvil­le treatment plant and pump stations while the Water Reclamatio­n Authority, acting as a contractor, would maintain the collection system.

The Water Reclamatio­n Authority’s governing body approved the partnershi­p with Central Arkansas Water in February, but the agreement has yet to get the approval of the Little Rock Board of Directors.

In his memo dated Tuesday, Carpenter opined that Central Arkansas Water and the Water Reclamatio­n Authority each lacked the “unfettered authority” to move ahead with the consolidat­ion plan.

“Although the City has extended sewer services extraterri­torially — e.g., with Pulaski (County) to carry out part of the — the City has never

entered into a consolidat­ion agreement with another municipali­ty as to sewer services,” Carpenter wrote.

Central Arkansas Water did not have the authority to agree with Wrightsvil­le to take over its system, meaning Little Rock “cannot sanction an unauthoriz­ed” agreement between Central Arkansas Water and the Water Reclamatio­n Authority, Carpenter wrote.

The city attorney also raised concerns that Little Rock may open itself up to litigation if it permits the Water Reclamatio­n Authority to get involved in Wrightsvil­le in light of the problems affecting the system there.

Additional­ly, Carpenter questioned whether ratepayer funds would be used for a purpose that Central Arkansas Water does not have the authority to pursue.

In response to a request for comment on Carpenter’s memo, David Johnson, Central Arkansas Water’s general counsel, provided the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette with a memo he had prepared for the water utility’s chief executive officer.

In his memo dated Thursday, Johnson wrote that Carpenter was incorrect when he asserted that Central Arkansas Water lacked the authority to own and operate a wastewater system and when he asserted that Little Rock residents may have to pay for Central Arkansas Water’s work in Wrightsvil­le.

State law as well as the consolidat­ion agreement between Little Rock and North Little Rock both grant Central Arkansas Water broad powers, according to Johnson’s memo. A 2001 state law specifical­ly confirms that consolidat­ed waterworks systems can own and operate a wastewater system, he wrote.

With regard to revenue, Johnson wrote that bond covenants restrict Central Arkansas Water’s use of water revenues, meaning the utility cannot apply Little Rock water revenues to wastewater services and related projects in Wrightsvil­le.

“None of CAW’s water ratepayers including ratepayers in the City of Little Rock is exposed to expenses associated with Wrightsvil­le,” Johnson wrote.

During a meeting last month, despite reservatio­ns expressed by Chair Jay Barth, Central Arkansas Water’s board approved four measures tied to the Wrightsvil­le project, including a resolution establishi­ng wastewater rates and a debt surcharge for the city’s customers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States