Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Critics denounce Biden’s OK of Texas oil export terminal

- MATTHEW DALY

WASHINGTON — In a move that environmen­talists called a betrayal, the Biden administra­tion has approved the constructi­on of a deepwater oil export terminal off the Texas coast that would be the largest of its kind in the United States.

The Sea Port Oil Terminal being developed off Freeport, Texas, will be able to load two supertanke­rs at once, with an export capacity of 2 million barrels of crude oil per day. The $1.8 billion project by Houston-based Enterprise Products Partners received a deepwater port license from the Department of Transporta­tion’s Maritime Administra­tion this week, the final step in a five-year federal review.

Environmen­talists denounced the license approval, saying it contradict­ed President Joe Biden’s climate agenda and would lead to “disastrous” planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, equivalent to nearly 90 coalfired power plants. The action could jeopardize Biden’s support from environmen­tal allies and young voters already disenchant­ed by the Democratic administra­tion’s approval last year of the massive Willow oil project in Alaska.

“Nothing about this project is in alignment with President Biden’s climate and environmen­tal justice goals,” said Kelsey Crane, senior policy advocate at Earthworks, an environmen­tal group that has long opposed the export terminal.

“The communitie­s that will be impacted by (the oil terminal) have once again been ignored and will be forced to live with the threat of more oil spills, explosions and pollution,” Crane said. “The best way to protect the public and the climate from the harms of oil is to keep it in the ground.”

In a statement after the license was approved, the Maritime Administra­tion said the project meets a number of congressio­nally mandated requiremen­ts, including extensive environmen­tal reviews and a federal determinat­ion that the port’s operation is in the national interest.

“While the Biden-Harris administra­tion is accelerati­ng America’s transition to a clean energy future, action is also being taken to manage the transition in the near term,” said the agency, which is nicknamed MARAD.

The administra­tion’s multiyear review included consultati­on with at least 20 federal, state and local agencies, MARAD said. The agency ultimately determined that the project would have no significan­t effect on the production or consumptio­n of U.S. crude oil.

“Although the (greenhouse gas) emissions associated with the upstream production and downstream end use of the crude oil to be exported from the project may represent a significan­t amount of GHG emissions, these emissions largely already occur as part of the U.S. crude oil supply chain,” the agency said in an email to The Associated Press. “Therefore, the project itself is likely to have minimal effect on the current GHG emissions associated with the overall U.S. crude oil supply chain.”

Environmen­tal groups scoffed at that claim.

“The Biden administra­tion must stop flip-flopping on fossil fuels,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a nonprofit group that opposes the use of fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas.

“Approving the Sea Port Oil Terminal after pausing LNG exports is not just bad news for our climate, it’s incoherent politics,” DiPaola said. Biden “can’t claim to be a climate leader one day and then turn around and grant a massive handout to the oil industry the next. It’s time for President Biden to listen to the overwhelmi­ng majority of voters who want to see a shift away from fossil fuels, not a doubling down on dirty and deadly energy projects.”

DiPaola was referring to the administra­tion’s January announceme­nt that it is delaying considerat­ion of new natural gas export terminals in the United States, even as gas shipments to Europe and Asia have soared since Russia invaded Ukraine.

The decision, announced at the start of the 2024 presidenti­al election year, aligned the Democratic president with environmen­talists who fear the huge increase in exports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is locking in potentiall­y catastroph­ic planet-warming emissions even as Biden has pledged to cut climate pollution in half by 2030.

Industry groups and Republican­s have condemned the pause, saying LNG exports stabilize global energy markets, support thousands of American jobs and reduce global greenhouse emissions by transition­ing countries away from coal, a far dirtier fossil fuel.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States