Austin American-Statesman

Calderón to be remembered for radical approach to cartels

- Bay, a national security expert and author, lives in Austin coming sunday

By

2050, enough time will have passed for historians to render a fair-minded judgment on Felipe Calderón and his six daring years as president of Mexico.

Calderón already rates as a radical reformer who pursued system-changing goals. He wasn’t the first Mexican president to acknowledg­e Mexico’s deep flaws. He was, however, the first who had the vision and adroit political skills to craft a political and social process that might – over time, if subsequent administra­tions sustain the effort — first mitigate, then eliminate them.

We already know Calderón had the personal courage and political will to employ radical but legal methods to achieve his goals of systemic political and economic modernizat­ion.

Calderón’s Cartel War, launched in December 2006, the first month of his term, was both an act of desperatio­n and the first step in his radical reform. Drug gangs, powered by the billions of dollars they reap feeding the USA’s appetite for illegal drugs, were in the violent process of carving Mexico into criminal satrapies.

To curb growing cartel powers, Calderon used a dangerous weapon: the Mexican military. His critics immediatel­y accused him of militarizi­ng a fight with criminal gangs. He argued the gangs posed a national threat.

Colombia’s narco-guerrillas had political aims for the territorie­s they controlled. Pure greed drove the Mexican cartelista­s’ more crafty squeeze of government and judicial institutio­ns. However, the deadly threat to the lives, liberty and property of honest citizens posed by both is cruelly similar. The cartels possessed military-level firepower. Their billions purchased machine guns and grenades, armored SUVs, and battlefiel­d communicat­ions systems. Los Zetas cartel, founded by Mexican Army defectors, employed commando tactics in its assaults on police stations and rival gangs. Ill-trained municipal, state, and yes, federal police forces were out-gunned by the gangs.

Police incompeten­ce was a pervasive shortcomin­g. But the real enemy of the Mexican people, at all levels, in the police forces, in the judiciary, among prosecutor­s, in state and federal political bureaucrac­ies, an enemy still leveraged by the cartels and crony billionair­es, is corruption.

The Mexican people regard the Mexican military as the most trusted national institutio­n. Calderón used it as the tool to begin building systemic trust. The military took the war to the cartels.

The resulting bloodbath became Calderón’s media legacy. Even though most of the deaths were from cartel versus cartel violence, headlines recording the murder and carnage led media talking heads to call Mexico a failed state-in-waiting. They missed Calderón’s critical strategic insight: Unless the cartels were challenged, militarily and morally, Mexico would surely fail.

The bullets and arrests, however, were temporary treatments. They cannot cure Mexico’s systemic ills. Calderón understood that corruption had economic and political penalties as well as security consequenc­es. In a 2008 speech he sketched the political objective: “Instead of faltering, we have taken on the challenge of turning Mexico into a country of laws.” Honest laws and an honest legal system had to trump rule by gun, bribe and insider whim. In that same speech he argued, “Today we are experienci­ng the consequenc­es of years of indifferen­ce to the cancer of crime, (legal) impunity and corruption. This scourge …constitute­s a challenge to the state’s viability.”

Calderón’s successor, Enrique Peña Nieto, insists he will continue to pursue essential reform. If he fails, the historians will treat him with deserved contempt. Antonio Garza, former U.S. ambassador to Mexico, looks at the challenges and prospects facing Mexico’s new president.

The Statesman’s Heisman voters revealed their ballots this week, with all five choosing Texas A&M quarterbac­k Johnny Manziel as their No. 1 pick. We asked if readers agreed with our staffers’ choices.

Jeremy W. Jones: Nope, give it to Te’o.

David Weller: A freshman QB who played against mostly substandar­d teams?

Alan Gomez: Te’o

Kevin Pierpoint: Let the pettiness flow from you. … Funny to watch.

David Cargill: Braxton Miller the quarterbac­k at Ohio State is the best player in the nation. They are on probation. So he gets no love. Come on writers you homers know that!

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States