Austin American-Statesman

Too much testing and not enough learning

- Com. facebook.com/statesman letters@statesman. Ratliff, R-mount Pleasant, was first elected to the State Board of Education in 2010. William J. (Joe) Mccreight, MD jmccreight@att.net Austin Jon Halter Round Rock

or email Quite

simply, high-stakes testing is sucking the individual­ity and creativity out of classrooms all across the state. How? Let me give you a few examples.

The problem starts at the State Board of Education. Our Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills curriculum standards are too long and too convoluted. How is this related to testing? Longer curriculum standards mean less time for teachers to ensure students are mastering content instead of skimming across the grasstops. This leads to failure on the state tests and remediatio­n when students arrive at college.

The problem is exacerbate­d when the Texas Legislatur­e makes the state’s tests count for 15 percent of the student’s local grade.

At the local level, when test days roll around, campuses go into “lockdown” mode and the entire building is transforme­d into a state-mandated testing factory. No bells ringing, students have to be completely quiet in the halls so they don’t disrupt those students taking the state’s test, schools that have multiple floors will separate testing kids from nontesting kids by floor. Lunch schedules are changed. Teachers are asked to “leave their office” and work from another classroom to accommodat­e this change. School billboards ask for prayers and support from the community. Parents are asked to send lemon drops or other things to “help” their kids perform well on the test.

Again, it affects more than just those students who are taking the test.

My wife teaches Spanish I. Her classes typically have a mix of freshmen, sophomores and the occasional junior. When test days roll around, her classes get ripped apart while some of her students are out testing. When the freshmen are testing, should she keep moving forward with the other students and leave the freshmen behind? This is assuming that she hasn’t been asked to get a substitute to cover her class while she helps monitor those students being tested or helps a disabled student with a modified or alternate TAKS or STAAR test. What about the individual student? The best visuals I can think of are two real-life stories. Last year my wife was monitoring a state test administra-

To join the conversati­on, go to tion when she noticed a student writing with one hand while holding and rubbing his rosary beads with the other.

Another story involves a student whose nose begins to bleed when the test starts because of the increased stress.

These examples shed some light on the unhealthy level of stress and emphasis placed on these tests.

Keep in mind, when you hear people talk about the number of test days in our schools, they only talk about those students who are actually taking the test. Those days don’t take into account the other impacts I’ve listed above. In other words, estimates of “testing days” don’t provide an accurate or complete picture.

Now, let’s take a step back for a second.

Is the test really the problem? Personally, I don’t think so.

Testing is a form of accountabi­lity and measuremen­t, and despite what the Texas Associatio­n of Business wants you to believe, parents are not against testing or accountabi­lity. What parents are against are the stakes riding on the outcome of those tests. What’s the solution to this situation?

We need the Legislatur­e to repeal the 15 percent grade requiremen­t.

We need the State Board of Education to reduce the length of the curriculum standards as they come up for renewal.

We need an accountabi­lity system that contains elements that have nothing to do with standardiz­ed tests. Graduation rates, University Interschol­astic League participat­ion, National Merit Scholars, CTE participat­ion, and dual credit enrollment are just a few suggestion­s. We also need to stop grading campuses and districts on their lowest performing sub-group. I know Commission­er Michael Williams and the education agency are working on this and they are headed in the right direction. I just hope they go far enough to make meaningful change.

We simply have too many statemanda­ted tests. Massachuse­tts, the envy of all public schools systems in the United States, has three state-mandated tests. Finland, which is the envy of all public school systems in the world, has one. That’s right, one.

reminds me of an old saying: “The cow doesn’t get heavier just because you weigh it more.”

time to put the high-stakes testing regime out to pasture. confirmed that addiction is a geneticall­y influenced chronic disease of brain reward circuitry. These neural pathways have evolved to ensure survival, thus the addict is compelled to seek out his drug of choice in the same way a starving person will resort to the most desperate measures to obtain food. Threats and punishment are not effective. There is ample research indicating that addiction treatment is at least as effective as treatment for other chronic diseases like diabetes and asthma. The governor’s focus should be on making treatment available to everyone who needs it. would-be Texas secessioni­sts: A statewide referendum should be held with the requiremen­t that the ballot not be secret. If the secessioni­sts win, the losers have the option of staying in Texas or moving to another state. If the secessioni­sts lose, they must move to another country, assuming they can find one that will accept them.

Always a crisis

Re: Dec. 5 article, “State grapples with grim prospect of ‘cliff’”

I remember so well my relief when Nov. 6 passed. The news media had blasted my mind with election rhetoric at every opportunit­y, over and over again. Now, I confess, every time I hear/read the term

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States