Austin American-Statesman

Number of businesses audited for illegal immigrants soars

Critics say audits have pushed workers further undergroun­d and disrupted businesses.

-

By Manuel Valdes SEATTLE — U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t reached its highest number yet of companies audited for illegal immigrants on their payrolls this past fiscal year.

Audits of employer I-9 forms increased from 250 in fiscal year 2007 to more than 3,000 in 2012. From fiscal years 2009 to 2012, the total amount of fines grew to nearly $13 million

Texas had the most workplaces fined with 63, followed by New Jersey with 37.

from $1 million. The number of company managers arrested has increased to 238, according to data provided by ICE.

The investigat­ions of companies have been one of the pillars of President Barack Obama’s immigratio­n policy.

When Obama recently spoke about addressing immigratio­n reform in his second term, he said any measure should contain penalties for companies that purposely hire illegal immigrants. It’s not a new stand, but one he will likely highlight as his administra­tion launches efforts to revamp the nation’s immigratio­n system.

“Our goal is compliance and deterrence,” said Brad Bench, special agent in charge at ICE’s Seattle office. “The majority of the companies we do audits on end up with no fines at all, but again it’s part of the deterrence method. If companies know we’re out there, looking across the board, they’re more likely to bring themselves into compliance.”

In fiscal year 2011, the most recent year reviewed by the Associated Press, the median fine was $11,000. The state with the most workplaces fined was Texas with 63, followed by New Jersey with 37.

The lowest fine was $90 to a Massachuse­tts fishing company. The highest fine was $394,944 to an employment agency in Minneapoli­s, according to the data released to AP through a public records request.

While the administra­tion has used those numbers to bolster their record on immigratio­n enforcemen­t, critics say the audits have pushed workers further undergroun­d by causing mass layoffs and disrupted business practices.

When the ICE audit letter arrived at Belco Forest Products, management wasn’t entirely surprised. Two nearby businesses in Shelton, a small timber town on a bay off Washington state’s Puget Sound, had already been investigat­ed.

But the 2010 inquiry became a months-long process that cost the timber company experience­d workers and money.

It was fined $17,700 for technicali­ties on their record keeping.

“What I don’t like is the roll of the dice,” said Belco’s chief financial officer Tom Behrens. “Why do some companies get audited and some don’t?”

Belco was one of 339 companies fined in fiscal year 2011 and one of thousands audited that year.

Employers are required to have their workers fill out an I-9 form that declares them authorized to work in the country. Currently, an employer needs only to verify that identifyin­g documents look real.

The audits, part of a $138 million work site enforcemen­t effort, rely on ICE officers scouring over payroll records to find names that don’t match Social Security numbers and other identifica­tion databases.

The audits “don’t make any sense before a legalizati­on program,” said Daniel Costa, an immigratio­n policy analyst at the Economic Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank. “You’re leaving the whole thing up to an employer’s eye- sight and subjective judgment, that’s the failure of the law. There’s no verificati­on at all. Then all you have is the government making a subjective judgment about subjective judgment.”

Many employers also wonder how ICE picks the companies it probes.

“Geography is not a factor. The size of the company is not a factor. And the industry it’s in is not a factor. We can audit any company anywhere of any size,” Bench said. He added ICE auditors follow leads from the public, other employers, employees and do perform some random audits.

But ICE auditors hit ethnic stores, restaurant­s, bakeries, manufactur­ing companies, constructi­on, food packaging, janitorial services, catering, dairies and farms. The aviation branch of corporate giant GE, franchises of sandwich shop Subway and a subsidiary of food product company Heinz were among some of the companies with national name recognitio­n. GE was fined $2,000.

A Subway spokesman said the company advises franchise owners to follow the law. A Heinz spokesman declined comment.

Bench didn’t have specifics on what percentage of fines come from companies having illegal immigrants on their payroll, as opposed to technical paperwork fines in recent years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States