Austin American-Statesman

Arkansas abortion ban is struck down

Appeals court rejects bans based on heartbeat.

- By Allen Reed

A federal appeals court rules that women would be unconstitu­tionally burdened by a law that bans abortions after the 12th week if a doctor can detect a fetal heartbeat.

LITTLE ROCK, ARK. — A federal appeals court struck down one of the nation’s toughest abortion restrictio­ns on Wednesday, ruling that women would be unconstitu­tionally burdened by an Arkansas law that bans abortions after the 12th week of pregnancy if a doctor can detect a fetal heartbeat.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with doctors who challenged the law, ruling that abor tion restrictio­ns must be based on a fetus’ ability to live outside the womb, not the presence of a fetal heartbeat that can be detec ted weeks earlier. The court said that standard was establishe­d by previous U.S. Supreme Court rulings.

The ruling upholds a dec ision of a federal judge in Arkansas who struck down the 2013 law before it could take effect, shortly after legislator­s approved the change. But the federal judge left in place ot her par ts of the law that required doctors to tell women if a fetal heartbeat was present; the appeals court also kept those elements in place.

Attorney General Leslie Rutledge’s office was reviewing the dec ision “and will evaluate how to proceed,” office spokesman Judd Deere sai d Wednesday afternoon.

The ruling wasn’t a surprise to Rita Sklar, executive director of the Amer- ican Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, which represente­d the two doctors challengin­g the law. She said the case was a waste of taxpayer time, and that the dec ision leaves medical decisions to doctors and their patients, rather than politician­s.

“We were kind of surprised it took as long as it did, frankly,” Sklar said. “From our point of view it was a pretty simple case.”

The law was among several abortion restrictio­ns Republican­s pushed through the Arkansas Legislatur­e shortly after they took control of both the Senate and House for fifirst time since Reconstruc­tion.

A similar law restrictin­g abortions to 20 weeks’ gestation is still in effect in Arkansas, as are similar bans in 11 other states, according to the nonprofit Guttmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights.

This year, legislatio­n to restrict abortion at 20 weeks or another specific gestationa­l age has been enacted in West Virginia and proposed in 12 other states. In Alabama, Ohio, and New York, proposed legislatio­n would ban abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which can be as early as six weeks into a pregnancy.

The 8th Circuit heard arguments in the Arkansas case in January, on the same day it heard arguments over a North Dakota law that also bans abor tions if a fetal heartbeat can be detected but didn’t include a specific number of weeks. The appeals court has yet to rule on the North Dakota law, which was struck down by a federal judge in that state.

In rejecting Arkansas’ fetal heartbeat law, the appeals court cautioned that the vi ability standard used to decide abortion-restrictio­n cases is becoming increasing­ly difficult to apply because of advances in medicine.

The ruling noted that in 1973, a fetus was considered viable af ter 28 weeks of pregnancy, but that the doctors challengin­g Arkansas’ law said viability was at 24 weeks’ gestation. The court also noted the birth last year of a girl in Florida at 21 weeks and six days’ gestation.

“Undeniably, medic al and technologi­cal advances along with mankind’s ever increasing knowledge of prenatal life ... make applicatio­n of ( the) viability standard more difficult,” the court wrote.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with doctors who challenged the law, ruling that abortion restrictio­ns must be based on a fetus’ ability to live outside the womb.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States