Austin American-Statesman

FBI’s Comey to DOJ: Refute Trump claim

But White House stands by Obama wiretappin­g allegation, seeks probe.

- Michael S. Schmidt and Michael D. Shear ©2017 The New York Times

FBI Director James B. Comey asked the Justice Department over the weekend to publicly reject President Donald Trump’s assertion that President Barack Obama ordered the tapping of Trump’s phones, senior U.S. officials said Sunday. Comey has argued that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected, they said, but the department has not released any such statement.

Comey, who made the request Saturday after Trump leveled his allegation on Twitter, has been working to get the Justice Department to knock down the claim because it falsely insinuates that the FBI broke the law, the officials said.

A spokesman for the FBI declined to comment. Sarah Isgur Flores, spokeswoma­n for the Justice Department, also declined to comment.

Comey’s request is a remarkable rebuke of a sitting president, putting the nation’s top law enforcemen­t official in the position of questionin­g Trump’s truthfulne­ss. The confrontat­ion between the two is the most serious consequenc­e of Trump’s weekend Twitter outburst, and it underscore­s the dangers of what the president and his aides

have unleashed by accusing the former president of a conspiracy to undermine Trump’s administra­tion.

The White House showed no indication that it would back down from Trump’s claims. On Sunday, the president demanded a congressio­nal inquiry into whether Obama had abused the power of federal law enforcemen­t agencies before the 2016 presidenti­al election. In a statement from his spokesman, Trump called “reports” about the wiretappin­g “very troubling” and said that Congress should examine them as part of its investigat­ions into Russia’s meddling in the election.

Along with concerns about the potential attacks on the bureau’s credibilit­y, senior FBI officials are said to be worried that the notion of a court-approved wiretap will raise the public’s expectatio­ns that federal authoritie­s have significan­t evidence implicatin­g the Trump campaign in colluding with Russia’s efforts to disrupt the presidenti­al election.

One problem Comey has faced is that there are few senior politicall­y appointed officials at the Justice Department who can make the decision to release a statement, the officials said. Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself Thursday from all matters related to the federal investigat­ion into connection­s between Trump, his associates and Russia.

Comey’s behind-thescenes maneuverin­g is certain to invite contrasts to his actions last year, when he spoke publicly about the Hillary Clinton email case and disregarde­d Justice Department entreaties not to.

It is not clear why Comey did not issue the statement himself. He is the most senior law enforcemen­t official who was kept on the job as the Obama administra­tion gave way to the Trump administra­tion. And while the Justice Department applies for intelligen­ce-gathering warrants, the FBI keeps its own set of records and is in position to know whether Trump’s claims are true. While intelligen­ce officials do not normally discuss the existence or nonexisten­ce of surveillan­ce warrants, no law prevents Comey from issuing the statement.

In his demand for a congressio­nal inquiry, the president, through his press secretary, Sean Spicer, issued a statement Sunday that said, “President Donald J. Trump is requesting that as part of their investigat­ion into Russian activity, the congressio­nal intelligen­ce committees exercise their oversight authority to determine whether executive branch investigat­ive powers were abused in 2016.”

Spicer, who repeated the entire statement in a series of Twitter messages, added that “neither the White House nor the president will comment further until such oversight is conducted.”

A spokesman for Obama and his former aides have called the accusation by Trump completely false, saying that Obama never ordered any wiretappin­g of a U.S. citizen.

“A cardinal rule of the Obama administra­tion was that no White House official ever interfered with any independen­t investigat­ion led by the Department of Justice,” Kevin Lewis, Obama’s spokesman, said in a statement Saturday.

Trump’s demand for a congressio­nal investigat­ion appears to be based, at least in part, on unproven claims by Breitbart News and conservati­ve talk radio hosts that secret warrants were issued authorizin­g the tapping of the phones of Trump and his aides at Trump Tower in New York.

In a series of Twitter messages Saturday, the president seemed to be convinced that those claims were true. In one post, Trump said, “I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!”

On Sunday, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, deputy White House press secretary, said the president was determined to find out what had really happened, calling it potentiall­y the “greatest abuse of power” that the country has ever seen.

“Look, I think he’s going off of informatio­n that he’s seen that has led him to believe that this is a very real potential,” Sanders said on ABC’s “This Week” program. “And if it is, this is the greatest overreach and the greatest abuse of power that I think we have ever seen and a huge attack on democracy itself. And the American people have a right to know if this took place.”

The claims about wiretappin­g appear similar in some ways to the unfounded voter fraud charges that Trump made during his first days in the Oval Office. Just after Inaugurati­on Day, he reiterated in a series of Twitter posts his belief that millions of voters had cast ballots illegally — claims that also appeared to be based on conspiracy theories from right-wing websites.

As with his demand for a wiretappin­g inquiry, Trump also called for a “major investigat­ion” into voter fraud, saying on Twitter that “depending on results, we will strengthen up voting procedures!” No investigat­ion has been started.

Senior law enforcemen­t and intelligen­ce officials who worked in the Obama administra­tion have said there were no secret intelligen­ce warrants regarding Trump. Asked whether such a warrant existed, James R. Clapper Jr., a former director of national intelligen­ce, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” “Not to my knowledge, no.”

“There was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect at the time as a candidate or against his campaign,” Clapper added.

Trump’s demands for a congressio­nal investigat­ion were initially met with skepticism by lawmakers, including Republican­s. Appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said he was “not sure what it is that he is talking about.”

“I’m not sure what the genesis of that statement was,” Rubio said.

 ?? ERIK S. LESSER / GETTY IMAGES ?? President Donald Trump waves as he walks across the South Lawn toward the White House in Washington on Sunday, after returning from a weekend at his estate in Palm Beach, Fla.
ERIK S. LESSER / GETTY IMAGES President Donald Trump waves as he walks across the South Lawn toward the White House in Washington on Sunday, after returning from a weekend at his estate in Palm Beach, Fla.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States