Austin American-Statesman

Texas’ tax break on condoms long gone

- By W. Gardner Selby wgselby@statesman.com

An Austin legislator talking up her proposal to exempt feminine hygiene products from the state sales tax asserted that condoms were sold tax-free in Texas for a spell.

Democratic state Rep. Donna Howard, speaking to reporters for the Dallas Morning News during a Facebook Live presentati­on, brought up condom tax history just after suggesting that ever-costly diapers also shouldn’t be subject to the state sales tax of 6.25 percent (local government­s are allowed to levy up to 2 percent more of sales tax).

Condoms, Howard went on, “used to be tax-exempt here in Texas until we changed something in the statute; the wording was such that it ... put them back out there where they were taxed.”

We wondered about that, ultimately finding that changes in law against a governor’s wishes resulted in a type of condom not being subject to sales tax for more than seven years.

To gauge this claim, we mostly relied on the Texas state comptrolle­r’s office, which oversees state tax collection­s. Spokeswoma­n Lauren Willis pointed out that a tax-cut package signed into law by Gov. George W. Bush in 1999 included language exempting condoms from the Texas sales tax.

Willis emailed us a web link to a March 2000 news story stat-

ing that contrary to Bush’s campaign-trail intentions, condoms would soon rank among products not subject to the state sales tax. Starting April 1, 2000, the news story said, “Texans won’t have to pay sales tax on non-prescripti­on medication­s, ointments to treat sunburns, laxatives or condoms.”

Before his re-election in 1998, Bush had proposed a $400 million tax-cut package including a sales tax break on over-the-counter health items.

Bush said in September 1998 that his proposed tax cut wouldn’t extend to nonprescri­ption contracept­ives, including condoms. “The governor is being touted by some in the GOP as a potential presidenti­al candidate in 2000,” the Morning News reported, “and some social conservati­ves have taken a strong stand against promiscuit­y and premarital sex.”

But in March 2000, state Comptrolle­r Carole Keeton Rylander announced she had no choice but to include condoms among items made tax-exempt in the tax-cut measure passed into law the year before. Calling her decision a “matter of law,” Rylander pointed out the new law required a drug, medicine or health care product to be exempt from taxes if it has a drug code number issued pursuant to FDA regulation­s. National drug codes, or NDCs, are three-digit segments that serve as universal product identifier­s, the FDA says.

A March 2000 Houston Chronicle news story said the legislated tax exemption would apply to all 100,000 nonprescri­ption products carrying an NDC.

That story noted that the original legislatio­n, Senate Bill 441 by state Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, would have exempted only children’s nonprescri­ption medicines from the sales tax but was expanded in Senate-House negotiatio­ns to include adult over-the-counter medicines — with the FDA code limitation intended to preclude tax breaks for herbal and folk remedies not sanctioned by that agency.

When we checked with the FDA about condoms having NDCs, spokeswoma­n Deborah Kotz replied that the agency considers condoms to be “devices” that don’t need NDCs, unlike medicines. Kotz told us, though, that some condom manufactur­ers have put NDCs on condoms sold over the counter, “often for reimbursem­ent purposes.” Some condoms, Kotz said, still have the numbers.

Willis said, and we confirmed, that the NDC language was removed by a 2001 law. Yet Senate Bill 1125 left spermicida­l condoms tax-exempt by simultaneo­usly adding language exempting products “labeled or required to be labeled with a ‘Drug Facts’ panel in accord” with FDA regulation­s. Kotz told us condoms, mostly regulated as devices and not as medicines, might have “facts” panels, but the FDA hasn’t required them to do that.

A 2007 change in law limited items exempt from the sales tax to products required to have the “Drug Facts” panels, Willis told us, which ended the condom tax exemption as of September 2007.

In the past fiscal year through August 2016, Willis said, the state sales tax on condoms yielded an estimated $7 million in revenue.

Our ruling

Howard said condoms “used to be tax-exempt here in Texas.”

Under a tax-cut measure approved by lawmakers and Bush in 1999, condoms containing spermicide were exempt from the state sales tax starting in April 2000. Another change in law ended that exemption as of September 2007.

We rate the claim True.

Contact W. Gardner Selby at 512-445-3644. Twitter: @gardnersel­by @politifact­texas

 ??  ?? DONNA HOWARD
Statement: Says condoms “used to be tax-exempt here in Texas.”
DONNA HOWARD Statement: Says condoms “used to be tax-exempt here in Texas.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States