White House won't say if it fed Nunes info
Administration invites lawmakers to examine classified documents.
The White House WASHINGTON — refused to say Thursday whether it secretly fed intelligence reports to a top Republican investigating possible coordination between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign.
Fending off growing criticism, the administration invited lawmakers from both parties to view classified material it said relates to surveillance of the president’s associates.
The White House’s invitation letter came amid a quickly rising storm over Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who heads the House Intelligence Committee. Two White House aides secretly helped Nunes examine intelligence information last week, according to U.S. intelligence officials.
The House panel’s work has been deeply, and perhaps irreparably, undermined by Nunes’ apparent coordination with the White House. He told reporters last week that he had seen troubling information about the improper distribution of Trump associates’ intercepted communications, and he briefed the president on the material, all before informing Rep. Adam Schiff, the
committee’s top Democrat.
Speaking on Capitol Hill Thursday, Schiff, D-Calif., said he was “more than willing” to accept the White House offer to view new information. But he raised concerns that Trump officials may have used Nunes to “launder information to our committee to avoid the true source.”
“The White House has a lot of questions to answer,” he declared.
The White House continued to sidestep queries about its role in showing Nunes classified information that appears to have included transcripts of foreign officials discussing Trump’s transition to the presidency, according to current and former U.S. officials. Intelligence agencies routinely monitor the communications of foreign officials living in the U.S., though the identities of Americans swept up in that collection is supposed to be protected.
Meanwhile, the Senate intelligence committee held its own hearing, a less combative affair in which Russia experts from universities, think tanks and elsewhere described a serious attempt to meddle in the U.S. election — and efforts in France and Germany as well. They also said Russian propaganda and fake news targeted not only the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, but Trump’s GOP primary opponents, including Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Lindsey Graham of North Carolina and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.
Clint Watts, of George Washington University’s Center for Cyber and Homeland Security, said during a break in the hearing that the one constant of the Russian campaign was “pumping up Trump.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin denied the allegations when questioned at a forum in the northern Russian city of Arkhangelsk. Injecting a bit of humor, Putin answered the question of whether Russia had interfered in the election by quoting a famous 1992 line from President George H.W. Bush.
“Read my lips: No,” he said, pronouncing the last word in English for emphasis.
In Washington early last week, White House officials privately encouraged reporters to look into whether information about Trump associates had been improperly revealed in the intelligence gathering process. Days later, Nunes announced that he had evidence, via an unnamed source, showing that Trump and his aides’ communications had been collected through legal means but then “widely disseminated” throughout government agencies. He said the collections were not related to the Russia investigation.
Trump spokesman Sean Spicer said Thursday the material the White House wants the House and Senate intelligence leaders to view was discovered by the National Security Council in the course of regular business. He would not say whether it was the same material Nunes had already seen.
A congressional aide said Schiff did not receive the White House letter until after Spicer announced it from the White House briefing room.
Spicer had previously dismissed the notion that the White House had funneled information to Nunes, saying the idea that the congressman would come and brief Trump on material the president’s team already had “doesn’t pass the smell test.” The White House quickly embraced Nunes’ revelations, saying they vindicated Trump’s explosive and unverified claim that President Barack Obama wiretapped his New York skyscraper.
Nunes has said the information he received did not support that allegation, which has also been disputed by Obama and top intelligence officials.
The White House officials who played roles in helping Nunes view the materials were identified as Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence at the White House National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, a White House lawyer who previously worked on the House Intelligence Committee.
Cohen-Watnick is among about a dozen White House officials who would have access to the types of classified information Nunes says he viewed. He has become a controversial figure in intelligence circles, but Trump decided to keep him on over the objections of the CIA and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, according to the officials. They spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly by name.
Cohen-Watnick and Nunes both served on the Trump transition team.
Stephen Slick, a former CIA and NSC official, said it would be “highly unusual and likely unprecedented” for a member of Congress to travel to the White House to view intelligence reports “without prior authorization.”
Nunes has repeatedly sidestepped questions about who provided him the intelligence reports, though he pointedly has not denied that his sources were in the White House. House Speaker Paul Ryan, in an interview with CBS’ “This Morning” that aired Thursday, said Nunes told him a “whistleblower type person” provided the information.
A spokesman for Ryan later said the speaker was not aware of Nunes’ source and continues to have “full confidence” in the congressman’s ability to run the Russia investigation.
U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, is facing criticism over his apparent coordination with the White House.
Clint Watts (right) of George Washington University’s Center for Cyber and Homeland Security testifies Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee alongside Eugene Rumer of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Russia’s election meddling was about “pumping up Trump,” Watts said.