Austin American-Statesman

Mean-spirited, bigoted bill waste of Legislatur­e’s time

-

The Texas Legislatur­e seems to have locked itself in the bathroom — and it won’t come out.

Outside, millions of Texans — like confused family members wondering what could be wrong — pound on the bathroom door, pleading for lawmakers to come out. We refer, of course, to legislatio­n that would force transgende­r folks to use public restrooms designated for their birth gender.

It’s Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s obsessive interest in who goes to the bathroom where that’s led to this impasse. Recently, Gov. Greg Abbott came in through the bathroom window to join Patrick’s effort.

Despite the fact that Texans have been sharing public restrooms with transgende­r people for decades, it’s suddenly an emergency issue. The state Senate has passed Senate Bill 6, which would require people to use restrooms that match the gender listed on their birth certificat­es.

The House, which is less predispose­d toward the legislatio­n, is nonetheles­s considerin­g a “compromise” bill with broad language that strips cities and school districts from passing laws regulating restroom access to protect a class of persons from discrimina­tion.

That seems more like capitulati­on than compromise. Yes, this new House version sponsored by Rep. Ron Simmons, R-Carrollton, drops the word “transgende­r.” The intent remains the same, even if it claims to paint a happy face on the doors of public restrooms.

The bathroom bills are opposed by many Texas businesses that look to the experience of North Carolina, which recently repealed its bathroom law after losing more than $600 million in revenue, according to a report in Forbes. The National Collegiate Athletic Associatio­n and the National Basketball Associatio­n had canceled events scheduled for that state after it passed the discrimina­tory legislatio­n.

The Associated Press has estimated that Texas could lose $3.67 billion over a dozen years if it adopts a similar bathroom bill. That casts the term “pay toilet” in a new light. For those too young to remember, some airports and other public facilities used to place parking meter-like coin mechanisms on stall doors. That was so yesterday. But so were overt discrimina­tory laws that targeted particular classes of people.

In many places, African-Americans were once forced to use segregated bathrooms and water fountains. They wouldn’t be served by the bigoted owners of some restaurant­s. Those are just examples. There are many other examples of legal discrimina­tion against this or that class.

But America grew out of such practices. U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts even said so. “Our country has changed,” Roberts said in his opinion, noting that some provisions of the Voting Rights Act were no longer necessary because racism had declined.

Roberts’ snow-blind exaggerati­ons are off-putting. Still, institutio­nalized bigotry has declined over the decades. Maybe some hard-right politician­s like Patrick miss the old days.

It would be foolhardy for the Legislatur­e to risk billions of dollars in the Texas economy by passing a discrimina­tory bathroom bill. That’s especially so when it’s understood that the real intentions of Patrick and other supporters is simply to pander to a few bigots on the far right.

The bathroom bills discrimina­te against transgende­r folks, could cost our economy billions of dollars and, on top of that, will likely be unenforcea­ble.

None of the contemplat­ed measures would penalize the person using the wrong restroom. No, only the owners of the restrooms would be in trouble. Or, perhaps, cities or school districts who moved to protect transgende­r people from discrimina­tion.

Many of our state leaders are annoyed that local government­s can pass ordinances and orders without their permission. They are moving on a variety of fronts to diminish the power of local voters to make their own decisions on a variety of issues.

Bathroom bills are the most ridiculous of the bunch. The time wasted on these proposals is time that should have been spent finding more money for public education, health care or economic opportunit­y for Texans.

If the Texas Legislatur­e is going to waste time, they should do so on something less mean-spirited, less regressive and less discrimina­tory.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States