» Trump’s Muslim comments key in travel ban case,

Federal judges mull whether comments mean Muslim ban.

A challenge RICHMOND, VA. — to President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban appears to hinge on whether a federal appeals court agrees that the Republican’s past anti-Muslim statements can be used against him.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrestled Monday with whether the court should look beyond the text of the executive order to comments made by Trump and his aides on the campaign trail and after his elec- tion in order to determine whether the policy illegally targets Muslims.

“That’s the most important issue in the whole case,” said Judge Robert B. King, who was appointed to the court by President Bill Clinton.

The panel of 13 judges peppered both sides with tough questions but gave few clues as to how they might rule. The judges did not immedi- ately issue a decision Monday.

A federal judge in Mary- land who blocked the travel ban in March cited Trump’s comments as evidence that the executive order is a realization of Trump’s repeated promise to bar Muslims from entering the country.

The administration argues that the court shouldn’t ques- tion the president’s national security decisions based on campaign promises.

“This is not a Muslim ban. Its text doesn’t have to anything to do with religion. Its operation doesn’t have anything to do with religion,” Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall told the appeals court.

The countries were cho- sen because they present terrorism risks and the ban applies to everyone in those countries regardless of reli- gion, Wall said. Further, the banned countries represent a small fraction of the world’s Muslim-majority nations, lawyers for the administra- tion say in court documents.

Omar Jadwat, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, noted that Trump’s call for a “total and complete shutdown” of Muslims entering the U.S. remained on his campaign website even after he took office.

That call, which was still online earlier Monday, appeared to have been taken down by the after- noon hearing.

Several judges expressed skepticism about the idea that the court would blind itself to Trump’s comments about Muslims.

“Don’t we get to consider what was actually said here and said very explicitly?” asked Judge James A. Wynn Jr., who was appointed by President Barack Obama.

Another judge said he was worried about the idea of court opening the door to using a president’s past to evaluate the constitutionality of a policy.