Austin American-Statesman

Officials: Israel was source of intel Trump gave to Russia,

- Adam Goldman, Matthew Rosenberg and Matt Apuzzo ©2017 The New York Times

The classified intelligen­ce that President Donald Trump disclosed in a meeting last week with Russian officials at the White House was provided by Israel, according to a current and a former U.S. official familiar with how the United States obtained the informatio­n. The revelation adds a potential diplomatic complicati­on to the episode.

Israel is one of the United States’ most important allies and a major intelligen­ce collector in the Middle East. The revelation that Trump boasted about some of Israel’s most sensitive informatio­n to the Russians could damage the relationsh­ip between the two countries. It also raises the possibilit­y that the informatio­n could be passed to Iran, Russia’s close ally and Israel’s main threat in the Middle East.

Israeli officials would not confirm that they were the source of the informatio­n that Trump shared. In a statement emailed to The New York Times, Ron Dermer, Israeli ambassador to the United States, reaffirmed that the two countries would maintain a close counterter­rorism relationsh­ip.

“Israel has full confidence in our intelligen­ce-sharing relationsh­ip with the United States and looks forward to deepening that relationsh­ip in the years ahead under President Trump,” Dermer said.

In the meeting with the Russian ambassador and foreign minister, Trump disclosed intelligen­ce about an Islamic State terrorist plot. At least some of the details that the United States has about the plot came from the Israelis, the officials said.

The officials, who were not authorized to discuss the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity, said Israel previously had urged the United States to be careful about the handling of the intelligen­ce that Trump discussed.

Trump said Tuesday on Twitter that he had an “absolute right” to share informatio­n in the interest of fighting terrorism and called it a “very, very successful meeting” in a brief appearance later Tuesday at the White House alongside Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, Trump’s national security adviser, told reporters that he was not concerned that informatio­n sharing among intelligen­ce partners would stop.

“What the president discussed with the foreign minister was wholly appropriat­e to that conversati­on and is consistent with the routine sharing of informatio­n between the president and any leaders with whom he’s engaged,” McMaster said at a White House briefing, seeking to play down the sensitivit­y of the informatio­n Trump disclosed.

McMaster added that the president, who he said was unaware of the source of the informatio­n, made a spur-ofthe-moment decision to tell the Russians what he knew.

But McMaster also appeared to acknowledg­e that Thomas P. Bossert, assistant to the president for homeland security and counterter­rorism, had called the CIA and the National Security Agency after the meeting with the Russian officials. Other officials have said that the spy agencies were contacted to help contain the damage from the leak to the Russians.

McMaster would not confirm that Bossert made the calls but suggested that if he did, he was acting “maybe from an overabunda­nce of caution.”

Israel’s concerns about the Trump White House’s handling of classified informatio­n were foreshadow­ed in the Israeli news media earlier this year. Newspapers there reported in January that U.S. officials warned their Israeli counterpar­ts to be careful about what they told the Trump administra­tion because it could be leaked to the Russians, given Trump’s openness toward President Vladimir Putin.

The episode could have far-reaching consequenc­es, Democrats warned. Any country that shares intelligen­ce with U.S. officials “could decide it can’t trust the United States with informatio­n, or worse, that it can’t trust the president of the United States with informatio­n,” said Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligen­ce Committee.

“I have to hope that someone will counsel the president about just what it means to protect closely held informatio­n and why this is so dangerous, ultimately, to our national security,” Schiff said at a policy conference in Washington sponsored by the Center for American Progress, a liberal group.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States