Austin American-Statesman

Sexual assault lawsuit presses need for regime change at Baylor

- LISA ROBERTS, AUSTIN

This week, we learned of yet another Title IX suit filed against Baylor, marking the seventh and most recent suit against the university.

The case alleges a 2012 gang rape perpetrate­d by members of the university’s football team against a Baylor volleyball player. Equally disturbing, the case alleges that a 21-second video recording of the rape was later circulated among football players.

The lawsuit also highlights the appalling culture where sexual assault by football players was considered a “bonding experience.” To add insult to injury, victims were alienated and could find no relief from their school. This could very well be the largest scandal ever in U.S. collegiate athletics — and we cannot sit idly as those who allowed it to take place avoid consequenc­es.

Where there could have been accountabi­lity, there has been shortsight­ed, institutio­nal collusion. Where the athletic department had the opportunit­y to address the crimes of their athletes, they instead fought to cover up their violence to protect their cashcow football program. They neglected the very women who were initially drawn to the university’s message, which states: “The mission of Baylor University is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integratin­g academic excellence and Christian commitment within a caring community.”

Instead of ousting the board members when the systematic cover-up became public, they remained in their leadership positions — even after their own version of an independen­t investigat­ion, known as the Pepper Hamilton Report, claimed the board had “governance issues” and conflicts of interest. Thirteen members of the board served through the time period in question. To this day, they have maintained their positions, further underminin­g claims of reform.

An actual complete report of what took place at Baylor has never been released to the public. The Pepper Hamilton “Findings of Fact” report was written by the Board of Regents themselves and fails to mention which officials were responsibl­e for the actions — or inaction — we already know about.

The Texas Rangers have begun their own independen­t investigat­ion into the Board of Regents and the members of the athletic department, which could uncover everything that happened. The simple improvemen­ts Baylor has made are just a facade. We clearly have all the informatio­n needed to demand a complete regime change of the higherups at Baylor.

It is ridiculous and outright shameful that the Texas Legislatur­e is considerin­g going into a special session to pass the notorious, so-called “bathroom bill.”

In fact, we have already passed legislatio­n in the past month that hurts insurance policyhold­ers, endangers minorities and decreases women’s access to family planning. Where are our priorities?

Protecting our higher-education institutio­ns from sexual assault ought to be an obvious, bipartisan emergency item. Not only are we failing to protect our students, we are allowing a criminal administra­tion to operate at one of our college campuses.

Yes, part of the athletic department staff was fired, though this is not a sincere attempt by the university to address the allegation­s. Responding to a student’s cry for help shouldn’t be a difficult task and should always take priority over athletic success.

As Muhammad Aziz, the plaintiff ’s lawyer, stated: clarified, “What we are seeking to enforce is just a safe education environmen­t for the girls at the school.” The fact that there needs to be an enforcemen­t of providing a safe education to students who pay $56,628 a year is inconceiva­ble.

As this session winds down, I am disappoint­ed in the path we continue to travel. How far are we regressing if we do nothing but wait with baited breath for another to speak up? I applaud the bravery that these survivors carry every single day, as their stories continue to be buried by people who care more about a university’s reputation than they do about the post-traumatic stress these victims will go through.

As an elected official — and more importantl­y, as a father of two girls — I will never grow weary of fighting for a safer environmen­t at institutio­ns of higher learning. This is why I am calling for the removal of any board member who has been serving since 2010.

Re: May 12 commentary, “How I’m honoring my immigrant mom this Mother’s Day.”

I would wager there are far more families “torn apart” by unauthoriz­ed immigrants voluntaril­y leaving loved ones in their home country than by those separated by immigratio­n enforcemen­t. Forbes reported that money sent from the U.S. replaced oil exports as Mexico’s largest source of foreign income — nearly $25 billion in 2015. That’s a lot of separated families.

They undoubtedl­y know the risk when they break our laws to live here — yet still choose to expose their families. While I have compassion when families are separated, primarily I’m thinking please, please don’t take that chance. I have far more compassion for those who play by the rules only to have a lawbreaker cut in line. How is that fair? And in case

May is National Skin Cancer awareness month. Please be informed by looking up the warning signs.

Have your doctor check your skin during office visits. Have family check the places you can’t see, such as your back, the back of your neck, your head and scalp.

Children exposed to too much sun may have a better chance of developing skin cancer in the future, so parents please take care.

Be aware that tanning facilities are the same as sunlight in that you are increasing your exposure to damaging light.

Lastly, keep in mind that skin cancer is not limited to fair-colored persons; other skin tones can have it also.

 ?? JAMES GREGG / AMERICAN-STATESMAN 2016 ?? Austin police help an unresponsi­ve man on Sixth Street in March 2016. A reader disagrees with ending a program that forced stiff penalties for downtown crime.
JAMES GREGG / AMERICAN-STATESMAN 2016 Austin police help an unresponsi­ve man on Sixth Street in March 2016. A reader disagrees with ending a program that forced stiff penalties for downtown crime.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States