Austin American-Statesman

Factory jobs abound, but wages remain low

A Michigan city shows limits of manufactur­ing.

- By Don Lee Los Angeles Times

— For a metropolit­an area of about 1 million people, Grand Rapids has retained the open, friendly feel of a small town, with the tree-lined streets and well-kept houses common in the Midwestern heartland.

It also has what may be a more important distinctio­n, something President Donald Trump says the whole country needs: manufactur­ing jobs — lots of them.

Fully 20 percent of workers here make things. That share of manufactur­ing jobs is more than twice the national average.

Grand Rapids is hardly the land of “rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones” that Trump evoked in his inaugurati­on address.

Manufactur­ing has helped drive unemployme­nt down to less than 3 percent, below the U.S. average, and a shortage of workers has led employers to raise starting pay, even to offer signing bonuses and give jobs to ex-offenders. That’s one reason the share of people working or looking for work here was nearly 69 percent last year, much higher than the nationwide average.

But neither is Grand Rapids a model for the rest of the country. For all its successes, wages overall remain relatively low on average — well below where they were when U.S. manufactur­ing dominated world markets.

And manufactur­ing here seems to have had a limited ripple effect. Four in 10 households cannot afford to cover basic necessitie­s such as housing, food and health care, according to a detailed United Way study updated this year.

It raises questions about the viability of Trump’s plan to fuel economic growth by returning the manufactur­ing sector to its heyday, and it leaves unresolved a fundamenta­l problem of the modern-day U.S. economy: how to provide stable jobs that pay enough to let workers live modestly comfortabl­e lives.

“If you’re looking for overall economic well-being, the path to prosperity is no longer factories,” said Lou Glazer, president of Michigan Future, a nonpartisa­n think tank in Ann Arbor.

Of the nation’s 52 metro areas with a population of at least 1 million, he noted, Grand Rapids is No. 1 in manufactur­ing as a percentage of overall employment. But it’s in the bottom five when it comes to income per resident.

“You don’t want the rest of the country to look like this,” he said.

Even so, the Grand Rapids area remains home to some big manufactur­ers that have shown a high degree of creative flexibilit­y and willingnes­s to adapt to challenges in the global economy. Among them are Haworth Inc., a $2 billion firm in nearby Holland that makes office furniture. It not only survived the Great Recession but came out stronger, more focused on contempora­ry design and customizin­g workspaces for companies.

“We don’t make widgets,” said Franco Bianchi, Haworth’s chief executive, using shorthand for old-fashioned manufactur­ing that focused on mass production of a single item or product — an approach that is often not nimble or flexible enough to meet the needs of rapidly changing consumers. Haworth employs 2,700 in the area.

Grand Rapids also boasts smaller industrial firms that use imaginativ­e ways to meet the challenges they face.

Wolverine Coil Spring Co. has been family-owned since 1946. Today it is more diversifie­d than in the past, making parts for rearview mirrors, dishwasher doors, office chairs, blood-circulatio­n machines.

But Wolverine’s president, Jay Dunwell, worries about the prospect of labor shortages down the road, considerin­g the already low unemployme­nt. So the 52-yearold executive has gone on the road himself.

He visits schoolchil­dren to talk up careers in manufactur­ing. To catch their interest, he uses some of Wolverine’s old products — grenade casings and ashtrays with springs inside to hold cigarettes.

Dunwell, like many other employers, has also responded to low unemployme­nt by offering better pay. But even so, the median hourly rate for production work in the Grand Rapids area — the midpoint where half make more and half less — was $14.51 last year, or about $30,000 a year.

That was no better than the earnings for workers in sales occupation­s, and it was about $2 an hour less than what office and administra­tive-support jobs paid, according to Michigan labor statistics.

That’s a stark change from the past, when manufactur­ing jobs on average paid significan­tly more than sales and lower-level white-collar jobs.

The median pay for all workers in the area was $16.41 an hour. That translates to roughly $34,000 a year.

As in most of the country, the causes include global competitio­n, mechanizat­ion and outsourcin­g, and a decline in unions — though unions were never as big in western Michigan as they were in Detroit and other industrial centers to the east.

Glazer of Michigan Future noted that the two biggest factors driving economic prosperity nationally are college education and the proportion of knowledge-based services in the local economy.

Grand Rapids is below average on both counts. As in Pittsburgh, Cleveland and other traditiona­l bastions of industry, what’s growing fastest are health care and business services, which employ many salaried profession­als but also large numbers of relatively low-skilled, less-educated and less-well-paid workers.

“If you care about people’s ability to pay their bills, you’ve got to figure out how to get them into high-wage work, and factories are not high-wage work,” Glazer said.

There are high-wage jobs in manufactur­ing, of course, but these increasing­ly require a college degree or special skills. For the 81,200 production workers in the Grand Rapids area, only 10 percent earned more than $25.13 an hour, or about $52,000 a year, last year, according to the Michigan Bureau of Labor Market Informatio­n.

Factory worker Ross Tenharmsel, 32, said manufactur­ing is in his blood.

His grandfathe­r retired from a General Motors body plant that once operated in the Grand Rapids area. Some 15 years ago, straight out of high school, Tenharmsel followed his father into the factory at RoMan Manufactur­ing, a maker of transforme­rs for the auto industry and other customers.

He started out at RoMan making $10.50 an hour and now earns a little more than double that doing pretty much the same job he did at the beginning: working the brazing torch. He stands at a spartan work station, where he keeps one small photo of his stay-at-home wife and two daughters, 4 and 1.

He’s been able to break into the top 10 percent of earners for production workers, sharply boosting his standard of living, but only by putting in a lot of overtime. During one stretch last year, he worked 60 hours a week for nine straight weeks. Altogether, he pulled down $70,000 last year, enough to sock away a little after paying the mortgage on his custom-built house and other bills.

It helped that, as with many other places in the Midwest, living costs here are modest. A resale home in the Grand Rapids area fetched a median price of $164,000 in the first quarter, versus $232,000 nationally. A gallon of milk costs $2 at a local Meijer supermarke­t, a buck less than the U.S. city average.

“It’s a business you’re not going to get rich in, but if you play your cards right, you can make a decent living,” Tenharmsel said.

And he still gets a lot of satisfacti­on at his job, taking pieces of parts and turning them into something.

 ?? DON LEE / LOS ANGELES TIMES ?? Employee Jim Blanchard works on a coil at RoMan Manufactur­ing, a maker of transforme­rs and other power sources.
DON LEE / LOS ANGELES TIMES Employee Jim Blanchard works on a coil at RoMan Manufactur­ing, a maker of transforme­rs and other power sources.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States