Austin American-Statesman

U.K. retailer removes gender-specific labels

Shoppers at John Lewis given ‘boys and girls’ option on kids’ clothes.

- Dan Bilefsky © 2017 New York Times

In the gender wars recently, British retailers have had trouble striking the right balance in the children’s aisle, either perpetuati­ng stereotype­s or going too far in the opposite direction.

The supermarke­t Asda came under criticism for selling T-shirts for boys featuring slogans like “Future Scientist,” while their T-shirts for girls proclaimed “Hey Cutie!” and “Ponies Rock.”

Last year, an 8-year-old British girl, Daisy Edmonds, became an internet sensation after her mother filmed her at a Tesco supermarke­t, railing against T-shirts she saw as sexist. Why, she asked, did the boys’ T-shirts say things like “Desert Adventure Awaits,” “Think Outside the Box” and “Hero” while the girls’ shirts were emblazoned with “Beautiful,” “Hey!” and “I Feel Fabulous”?

“Everyone thinks girls should just be pretty and boys should just be adventurou­s!” she said.

But now, some consumers are saying retailer John Lewis has gone to the other extreme, after news reports that the chain has removed gender-specific labels altogether from its brand of children’s clothes. Instead, it is putting “boys & girls” or “girls & boys” tags on these items, whether trousers or skirts.

John Lewis said Monday that it had scrapped “girls” and “boys” signs at its department stores last year and had introduced unisex babywear earlier this year. Caroline Bettis, its head of children’s wear, said the move was aimed at overcoming stereotype­s.

“We do not want to reinforce gender stereotype­s within our John Lewis collection­s and instead want to provide greater choice and variety to our customers,” she said.

The new policy, praised by many parents and rights advocates for promoting inclusiven­ess and breaking outmoded norms, has provoked spirited debate on social media and elsewhere.

Opponents of the change

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States