Austin American-Statesman

Meter readers caused bill spikes

Austin officials say they will likely seek legal action for fabricatio­ns.

- By Elizabeth Findell efindell@statesman.com Water bills continued on A8

Austin officials now have an answer to the mystery of what caused the water bills of thousands of residents to spike in September — and it’s exactly what residents had suspected and the Austin Water Utility had denied was possible.

Two former water meter readers apparently fabricated readings along their routes in late summer, said Kerry Overton, deputy general manager of Austin Energy, which handles billing for both the water and electric utilities. “What they put in as meter reads

could not have happened during the time frame,” Overton said of Corix’s analysis of its employees.

The city contracted out the meter reading work to Corix,

and city officials said they expect to seek legal action against the firm. Corix representa­tives, who have not responded to requests for comment for previous stories, did not immediatel­y return calls for comment late Tuesday afternoon.

The conclusion directly contradict­s Austin Energy’s repeated insistence that its system would have made it

impossible for meter readers to falsify meter read-

ings. Officials told the Amer- ican-Statesman and other media outlets that readers do not have access to previous usage numbers for residences on the meter and, thus, have no way to make up new readings. It shouldn’t be possible for

meter readers to estimate reads under the process, said Elaine Veselka, Austin Energy vice president of cus- tomer accounts. “How they did it — if they wrote July reads down and then guess

timated an August read or if they gained access to the system — we don’t know,” she said.

The faulty readings under- estimated August water use in certain neighborho­ods, which caused overbillin­g in September when accurate readings were made. Because Austin has a tiered billing system, some of the affected residents were billed at higher rates than they would have been if their meters had been read accurately in August.

August was the f i nal month Corix worked for Austin before a new com- pany, Akron, Ohio-based Bermex, took over the con- tract in September. Corix was short-staffed on meter readers during that time, according to informatio­n presented at a Utility Commission meeting in January.

The Statesman first reported on the bill spikes in October in one Circle C neighborho­od. The States- man then analyzed usage of more than 100 residents who sent their bills to the paper, showing the unusual dips

and spikes. Austin Energy ultimately provided refunds to more than 7,000 residents who were overcharge­d.

Most of those customers received a “smoothing” of their bills that averaged them across the affected months, to reduce the

impact of higher cost tiers. The credits ranged from 3 cents to $84.

In January, the util- ity began requiring read- ers to take photos of each individual meter, at an addi- tional cost of about $400,000 to $500,000 a year. Austin Water also sent its workers to read some meters and double-check the work of the contracted readers.

Overton said a legal team representi­ng Austin Energy has been notified and “will be seeking remedy under

the contract” with Corix, a private corporatio­n with headquarte­rs in Vancouver, B.C., and Northbrook, Ill. It’s unclear at this point what that might entail. He added that the two meter readers involved no longer work for Corix and do not work for Bermex either.

‘What they put in as meter reads could not have happened ...’ Kerry Overton; Deputy general manager of Austin Energy, which handles billing for both the water and electric utilities

 ?? RICARDO B. BRAZZIELL / AMERICAN-STATESMAN 2017 ?? Two ex-water meter readers fabricated readings along routes in late summer.
RICARDO B. BRAZZIELL / AMERICAN-STATESMAN 2017 Two ex-water meter readers fabricated readings along routes in late summer.
 ?? RICARDO B. BRAZZIELL / AMERICAN-STATESMAN 2017 ?? The faulty readings underestim­ated August water use in certain neighborho­ods, which caused overbillin­g in September when accurate readings were made.
RICARDO B. BRAZZIELL / AMERICAN-STATESMAN 2017 The faulty readings underestim­ated August water use in certain neighborho­ods, which caused overbillin­g in September when accurate readings were made.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States