Austin American-Statesman

Attorney in Clinton case joins Trump

Emmet Flood was thenpresid­ent’s lawyer amid impeachmen­t process.

- By Chad Day and Erick Tucker

Facing critical decisions in the Russia investigat­ion, President Donald Trump has hired Emmet Flood, a veteran attorney who represente­d Bill Clinton during his impeachmen­t process.

The White House announced the hiring not long after announcing the retirement of lawyer Ty Cobb, who has been the administra­tion’s point person dealing with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion. It’s the latest shakeup for the legal team grappling with unresolved questions on how to protect the president from legal and political jeopardy.

Cobb informed White House chief of staff John Kelly last week that he would retire at the end of May. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement that Cobb had been discussing the decision for “several weeks.”

She said later that Flood would be joining the White House staff to “represent the president and the administra­tion against the Russia witch hunt.”

The law firm of Williams & Connolly confirmed that Flood was leaving to join the White House staff.

Cobb did not personally represent the president, but he was a critical adviser, coordinati­ng dealings with Mueller, functionin­g as

a point person for document

and interview requests and working closely with Trump’s personal lawyers.

His retirement comes as the president’s personal legal team has been negotiatin­g the terms of a possible sitdown between Trump and prosecutor­s. Cobb had advo- cated cooperatio­n with Muel- ler, including a presidenti­al interview, in hopes of bring- ing the investigat­ion to an end. Trump initially said he was eager to be interviewe­d, but his perspectiv­e on Muel- ler soured a raid last month targeting his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, in a sep- arate investigat­ion.

Cobb’s departure was not unexpected given that he had largely wrapped up his duties of providing docu- ments to Mueller and shep- herding aides through voluntary interviews with the special counsel’s team.

Still, his retirement is the latest evolution for a legal team marked by turnover. His lead personal lawyer, John Dowd, left in March. Another attorney who Trump tried to bring on ultimately passed because of conflicts, and the president two weeks ago added former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and a pair of former prosecutor­s, Martin and Jane Raskin, to work alongside mainstay lawyer Jay Sekulow.

But critical decisions lie ahead. The president’s legal team has not committed to an interview with Mueller, who has dozens of questions on a broad array of topics he’d like to ask Trump.

Those negotiatio­ns are hugely consequent­ial, espe- cially since one of Trump’s former personal attorneys, John Dowd, confirmed to The Associated Press this week that Mueller’s team in March raised the prospect of issu- ing a grand jury subpoena for Trump, an extraordin­ary idea that would seek to force a sitting president to testify under oath.

It was not immediatel­y clear in what context the possibilit­y of a subpoena was raised or how serious Mueller’s prosecutor­s were about such a move. Mueller is probing not only Russian election interfer- ence and possible coordina- tion with Trump associates

but possible obstructio­n of justice by Trump.

Even if Mueller’s team decided to subpoena Trump as part of the investigat­ion, the president could still fight it in court or refuse to answer questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment protec- tion from self-incriminat­ion.

Trump lashed out against the investigat­ion in a familiar fashion Wednesday, saying on Twitter: “There was no Collusion (it is a Hoax) and there is no Obstructio­n of Justice (that is a setup & trap).”

Also Wednesday, Trump echoed the concerns of a small group of House conser- vatives who have been criticizin­g the Justice Department for not turning over certain investigat­ory documents.

“A Rigged System - They don’t want to turn over Documents to Congress,” Trump tweeted. “What are they afraid of ? Why so much redacting? Why such unequal “justice?” At some point I will have no choice but to use the powers granted to the Presidency and get involved!”

It was unclear what Trump meant by “get involved.”

Several Republican House committee chairmen have recently negotiated deals with the Justice Department to turn over documents related to Russia investigat­ions into Trump and also

the 2016 investigat­ion into Democrat Hillary Clinton’s emails. The Justice Department says that “dozens of members and staff from both parties” have viewed thousands of classified documents and House staff even have temporary office space in the department to review additional materials.

But some lawmakers who sit on those committees remain unsatisfie­d, particular­ly members of the conservati­ve House Freedom Caucus. Some of those lawmakers have asked for an unredacted version of a Justice Department document from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that sets out the scope for Mueller’s probe, a request that the

department immediatel­y denied because it pertains to an ongoing investigat­ion.

 ?? OLIVER CONTRERAS / SIPA USA ?? President Donald Trump, seen Tuesday outside the Oval Office, has encountere­d substantia­l turnover in his White House legal team, which has been grappling with strategy in the Mueller investigat­ion.
OLIVER CONTRERAS / SIPA USA President Donald Trump, seen Tuesday outside the Oval Office, has encountere­d substantia­l turnover in his White House legal team, which has been grappling with strategy in the Mueller investigat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States