Austin American-Statesman

Counties declare ‘sanctuary’ status to fight gun restrictio­ns

- By Don Babwin

Several rural Illinois counties have taken a stand for gun rights by co-opting a word that conservati­ves associate with a liberal policy to skirt the law: sanctuary.

At least five counties recently passed resolution­s declaring themselves sanctuary counties for gun owners — a reference to so-called sanctuary cities such as Chicago that don’t cooperate with aspects of federal immigratio­n enforcemen­t.

The resolution­s are meant to put the Democratic-con- trolled Legislatur­e on notice that if it passes a host of gun bills, including new age restrictio­ns for certain weapons, a bump stock ban and size limit for gun magazines, the coun- ties might bar their employees from enforcing the new laws.

“It’s a buzzword, a word that really gets attention. With all these sanctuary cities, we just decided to turn it around to protect our Second Amendment rights,” said David Camp- bell, vice chairman of the Effingham County Board. He said at least 20 Illinois counties and local officials in Oregon and Washington have asked for copies of Effingham Coun- ty’s resolution.

County officials fear their state legislator­s won’t be able to stop the passage of the gun restrictio­ns because they are outnumbere­d by lawmakers from in and around Chicago, where the vast majority of the more than 650 homicides last year involved guns.

Co-opting the sanctuary title is also a way of drawing attention to the rural-urban political divide that was so stark in the last general election, when “downstate” areas of Illinois backed Donald Trump, who remains popular with those voters, while the Chicago backed Hillary Clinton, who grew up in the suburbs.

“We’re just stealing the lan- guage that sanctuary cities use,” explained the Effing- ham County’s top prosecu- tor, Bryan Kibler, who came up with the idea.

Not lost on them is that lawmakers from Chicago were instrument­al in turning Illinois into what they derisively call a “sanctuary state” by pass- ing recent legislatio­n that prohibits local law enforcemen­t from arresting or detaining people based solely on their immigratio­n status. Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner signed it into law.

“They are trying to make a point that they really resent how the city of Chicago treats the rest of the state and how they’re treated as gun owners,” said Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illi- nois State Rifle Associatio­n.

The resolution­s are largely symbolic — a way for communitie­s where guns are cherished and where hunting is a way of life to make the point that they view most restrictio­ns on guns to be uncon- stitutiona­l.

“We wanted to ... get across that our Second Amendment rights are slowly being stripped away,” Kibler said.

Dave Workman, of the Bellevue, Wash.-based Second Amendment Foundation, sees something more.

“It’s like a warning shot across somebody’s bow,” said Workman, who knows of one other place, Oregon’s Deschutes County, that is looking at doing something similar to the Illinois counties. “If you’ve got four or five counties telling Chicago something, that’s significan­t.”

Such talk worries Kathleen Willis, a Democratic state representa­tive from suburban Chicago who sponsored some of the gun legislatio­n.

“I don’t think you can say, ‘I don’t agree with the law so I won’t enforce it,’” she said. “I think it sends the wrong message.”

Kibler, though, said he thinks the resolution­s send the same message that cities like Chicago send by refusing to cooperate with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s. He said he won’t speculate about how he’d deal with new gun restrictio­ns that haven’t been signed into law, but that legislator­s need to understand, “If you pass it we might not pay attention to it.”

Kibler pointed out that prosecutor­s already have a lot of discretion and cited an example in which he gave a gun owner a break. He dismissed charges against a man after police found a gun in the car he’d driven from Mississipp­i, where it is legal to carry guns openly, to Illinois, where it’s not. “The guy had no (criminal) history and he had it on the side of the front seat of his car in a sack, so I dismissed it,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States