Baltimore Sun Sunday

Colleges expand anti-assault efforts

More campuses are giving lessons on bystanders’ power

- By Danielle Paquette

The woman identified in court documents as “Emily Doe” taped a drawing of two bicycles above her bed. It reminds her of the strangers who came to embody protection — the pair of cycling Stanford University graduate students who stopped her sexual assault.

“There are heroes in this story,” the 23-year-old woman wrote in an impact statement that went viral after she read it aloud this month in court. “We are looking out for one another.”

That’s a sentiment hundreds of schools are hoping will drive more of their students to take action, and they’re teaching them exactly how to do it. Nationwide, more campuses are providing students lessons in “bystander interventi­on,” a strategy that encourages everyone to step in and stop such attacks, ideally before they happen.

American colleges began formal efforts to curb assaults in the 1990s, focused on two dominant strategies: teach men not to rape and teach women to avoid rape. Over the past decade, however, that message has expanded to target observers.

Stanford doesn’t require its graduate students to go through its sexual assault program, which includes bystander interventi­on training. But two of them have become the latest high-profile examples of the philosophy in action.

One night in January 2015, Carl-Fredrik Arndt and Peter Jonsson, both from Sweden, skidded to a stop when they spotted a man on top of a half-naked woman behind a dumpster. The cyclists pedaled closer and realized she was unconsciou­s. Arndt recalled asking: “What the hell are you doing?”

The man took off running. Arndt and Jonsson chased him, pinned him to the ground and called the police. The assailant was later identified as Brock Turner, then a freshman at the school and an All-American swimmer. He was found guilty of three charges related to sexual assault in March and sentenced this month to six months in county jail, followed by three years of probation.

Arndt and Jonsson’s citizen arrest is bystander interventi­on at its most extreme, and educators understand that not everyone who observes trouble will have the muscle of two men. So college programs are recommendi­ng actions most students can take.

Among those programs is Green Dot, a growing national campaign that was started six years ago to stop campus rape through bystander interventi­on. Dorothy Edwards, a former director of the University of Kentucky’s Violence Interventi­on and Prevention Center, wrote the curriculum that about 300 colleges have since adopted, including Harvard, the University of Notre Dame and Northweste­rn University.

Green Dot aims to teach students how to identify strange behavior. If they see a man leading a stumbling woman into a room, for example, why not ask: “Is that your boyfriend?” If they see someone start to pass out at a house party, they’re advised to call the person a cab.

Students, instructed to place their own safety first, follow the “Three D’s” — direct, delegate or distract.

In Doe’s case, Arndt and Jonsson took the direct approach: They broke up a sexual assault and tackled the assailant. Individual­s with less brawn might elect to delegate, or call for help. The distract route more generally applies to situations before they’ve escalated. A partygoer, for example, could tell a man feeding shots to a word-slurring woman that his car is being towed. Another could walk the intoxicate­d woman home.

The program builds on other national efforts. Bringing in the Bystander started at the University of New Hampshire in 2002 and operates today at about 600 campuses, organizers say. Mentors in Violence Prevention, created in 1993 by Jackson Katz at Northeaste­rn University’s Center for the Study of Sport in Society, has spread to 250 college athletic programs. In 2014, President Barack Obama launched a bystander interventi­on campaign called It’s On Us, which, according to the White House, asks men and women “to make a personal commitment to step off the sidelines and be part of the solution to campus sexual assault.”

Stanford offers its own sexual assault education, which includes bystander interventi­on training, a spokespers­on said. The program is mandatory for undergradu­ates and, starting this fall, graduate students will be required to complete it.

Doe’s story could have ended differentl­y, Edwards said. Arndt and Jonsson could have dismissed the sight as just another sloppy hookup. A victim might have missed prompt medical attention. A predator might have gotten away to strike again.

“People think, ‘Hey, if you’re a good person, you’ll do something,’ ” Edwards said. “In reality, it’s not that simple. Even if we want to act, we sometimes don’t. We might be worried about getting into a dangerous situation. We might be embarrasse­d.”

How effective the programs have been in preventing sexual assault is empiricall­y unknown, although advocates say they’ve heard stories from students who’ve gone on to help a peer.

Researcher­s who seek to measure the effect of bystander interventi­on training look for changes in program recipients’ behavior. In addition to taking action to potentiall­y thwart a crime, they might have learned not to commit the predatory actions they were taught to foil.

In a 2014 study of Green Dot’s impact funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ann Coker of the University of Kentucky surveyed more than 80,000 high school students. Over a five-year period, half received the bystander interventi­on training. She asked them to anonymousl­y answer whether they’d ever done something consistent with rape (“Have you had sexual activities with another high school student because she/ he was drunk or on drugs?”). Those who had received the training reported about 50 percent less “perpetrati­on,” Coker found, than those who had never taken a course.

John Foubert, an Oklahoma State University professor who has led campus anti-rape efforts since 1993, discovered a similar shift among freshmen fraternity brothers in a 2007 study. He also asked “trick questions” in anonymous surveys, including: Have you attempted to insert your penis into a woman’s vagina when she didn’t want you to?

“They wouldn’t necessaril­y define their behavior as rape,” he said, “when in fact that’s what it was.”

Previous research found that 8 percent of fraternity brothers had admitted to committing a sexually coercive act. Among the men in Foubert’s sample who’d received bystander interventi­on training, 6 percent reported the same, compared to 10 percent of those who did not take a class.

Such behavioral changes didn’t emerge in evaluation­s until after Foubert added bystander interventi­on to his sexual assault prevention programs, he said.

 ?? TESSA ORMENYI ?? A sign about rape is displayed at Stanford University, where two graduate students stopped a sexual assault last year.
TESSA ORMENYI A sign about rape is displayed at Stanford University, where two graduate students stopped a sexual assault last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States