Baltimore Sun Sunday

Trump tactics come with risks

Scorched-earth campaignin­g could create lasting U.S. divide, many say

- By Noah Bierman noah.bierman@latimes.com

WASHINGTON — As he fell further behind in polls and battled allegation­s of sexual misconduct in recent days, Donald Trump moved to darker corners. He sketched out conspiraci­es involving global bankers, casually threatened to jail his political opponent and warned in increasing­ly specific terms that a loss by him would spell the end of civilizati­on.

The distrust of U.S. institutio­ns Trump has nurtured among his core supporters is readily apparent.

One North Carolina man predicted in an interview that the military would probably assassinat­e Hillary Clinton if she’s elected president. A woman at an Iowa town hall for Trump’s running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, offered to join a revolution if Clinton prevails. Another man at an Ocala, Fla., rally was certain Trump would fire the FBI and scores of other federal bureaucrat­s in a houseclean­ing if he wins.

Many who have watched Trump’s campaign warn that the spread of such ideas may be only the beginning. The scorched-earth strategy Trump has adopted risks creating a lasting and bitter divide in American society, they say.

“It is going to have consequenc­es,” said Charlie Sykes, a conservati­ve radio host in Wisconsin who has raised alarms about the Republican Party’s identity crisis. “Somebody referred to this as civic vandalism: the paranoia, the injection of the conspiracy theories that there are dark forces that somehow are going to rob him of this election.”

Historians, political scientists and other experts say the durability of Trump, what he proudly calls his movement and the extent of its impact will depend heavily on the results of the election.

Even a tight loss, let alone a Trump win, could push his brand of politics further into the mainstream. Not only would future candidates and the GOP adopt some of the sharp rhetoric, but members of Congress in districts carried by Trump might feel compelled to join in, regardless of the outcome of the presidenti­al election.

“If this is a close election, this is a signal that there are real rewards for this type of discourse,” said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvan­ia.

Alternativ­ely, though a Clinton landslide would almost certainly force changes in the two major political parties, it might not create the same fundamenta­l reordering in the country’s politics. Without Trump, the movement could die.

Historians point to the strength of the country’s institutio­ns and the short memories many Americans have after bitter campaigns, making the case that Trump could present more of a ripple than a sea change.

No matter its results, the election has shown that the country, and both political parties, are splitting apart more deeply. Eight in 10 voters in a Pew Research Center survey released Friday say Trump supporters and Clinton supporters don’t just disagree on ideas or policy solutions; they rely on different sets of facts.

Another poll, taken this month by SurveyMonk­ey, found that 40 percent of voters said they had lost faith in American democracy, while 6 percent said they never had it.

If Trump refuses to concede a close loss to Clinton, that faith could erode even further.

Trump has been a master at tapping into the polarized fact universe, devoting much of a Thursday speech in West Palm Beach, Fla., to castigatin­g the establishm­ent media as part of a larger conspiracy, working with the Clinton machine to destroy him “as part of a concerted, coordinate­d and vicious attack.”

The conspiracy, he said, includes Clinton meeting “in secret with internatio­nal banks to plot the destructio­n of U.S. sovereignt­y” and enrich “global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.”

On Saturday, as sexual assault allegation­s piled up against him, he tweeted about a “FIX!” and an election being “rigged by the media pushing false and unsubstant­iated charges, and outright lies, in order to elect Crooked Hillary!”

The rhetoric had the markings of Trump’s campaign chief, Stephen Bannon, who as editor of the conservati­ve website Breitbart News pushed against the mainstream media with stories about a global conspiracy of elites bent on underminin­g America’s culture and civilizati­on.

Clinton has tried to make Trump’s temperamen­t the central topic of this election. But the Democratic nominee insisted on Friday that she is not taking satisfacti­on in his increasing­ly erratic behavior.

“Damage is being done that we’re going to have to repair,” she said during a visit to a campaign office in Seattle. “Divisions are being deepened that we’re going to have to try to heal.”

Republican­s are expecting a party battle, with Trump supporters on one side blaming mainstream Republican­s for backing off from Trump and factions of mainstream Republican­s blaming Trump supporters for making him the nominee.

Many of Trump’s backers have pledged to stick with him amid a growing list of GOP lawmakers who have renounced their support.

“They’re turncoats,” said Terry Gravely, a 72-year-old Trump supporter at a Pence rally in Fletcher, N.C. “They will regret it.” Los Angeles Times reporters Michael A. Memoli in Seattle and Melanie Mason in Ocala contribute­d.

 ?? SARAH RICE/GETTY ?? Republican presidenti­al nominee Donald Trump has nurtured a distrust of U.S. institutio­ns among his core supporters.
SARAH RICE/GETTY Republican presidenti­al nominee Donald Trump has nurtured a distrust of U.S. institutio­ns among his core supporters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States