Baltimore Sun Sunday

Tracing early human travel is no easy task

Fossil fragment found in Israeli cave alters timetable of migration from Africa

- By Deborah Netburn

The story of how and when modern humans first left Africa may be more ancient and more complex than anyone knew.

Last week, anthropolo­gists excavating a collapsed cave in Israel described a Homo sapiens fossil fragment that has been dated to between 194,000 and 175,000 years ago.

It is the earliest known modern human fossil to be found outside Africa.

The discovery, detailed Thursday in the journal Science, provides the first physical evidence that Homo sapiens migrated out of the African continent tens of thousands of years earlier than previously thought.

“For more than 50 years most anthropolo­gists thought modern humans left Africa around 100,000 years ago,” said Israel Hershkovit­z, the professor of anthropolo­gy at Tel Aviv University in Israel who led the work. “This changes the whole concept of modern human evolution.”

Rick Potts, a paleoanthr­oplogist and head of the human origins program at the Smithsonia­n National Museum of Natural History, said the new study supports a growing body of fossil and genetic evidence that suggests our species made several short-lived forays out of Africa before ultimately dispersing around the globe starting roughly 70,000 years ago.

“The find leaves open the possibilit­y that Homo sapiens ventured long distances but were not successful in taking up permanent residence in western or eastern Asia,” said Potts, who was not involved in the work. “They apparently became extinct.”

The recently excavated fossil was found embedded in sediments at an archaeolog­ical site known as the Misliya Cave in northern Israel, about 7 miles south of Haifa. The cave, which probably served as a shelter for these hominids, is on the western slope of Mount Carmel.

Archaeolog­ists working at the site found evidence that the cave’s inhabitant­s hunted large game like wild cattle and gazelle and were able to control fire. Several small stone tools similar to those associated with Homo sapiens remains in Africa from the same time period were found at Misliya as well.

The newly discovered fossil contains a lower left jawbone with eight teeth still attached. It also includes part of the cheekbone, the roof of the mouth and the bottom of the nasal cavity.

Ideally, anthropolo­gists would examine a full skull before determinin­g how to categorize an ancient specimen. For example, a small face tucked underneath a forehead and a rounded brain case clearly indicates Homo sapiens rather than another species, Potts said.

In this case, however, the research team did not have that option. Instead, they compared precise measuremen­ts of the size and shape of the teeth and the jawbone with other ancient hominid fossils from Europe and Africa. In this way, they were able to show that the fossil’s features had the most in common with our species.

“Nothing we found was inconsiste­nt with it being Homo sapiens, and some features clearly indicated it was Homo sapiens,” said Rolf Quam, a paleoanthr­opologist at Binghamton University in New York who worked on the study.

Potts said the multiple lines of evidence that the researcher­s used to make the ID were persuasive for him.

The research team used three different methods of dating the fossil and the sediments around it. They dated the age of tooth samples using uranium-thorium, turned to combined electron spin resonance techniques to date enamel samples, and relied on thermolumi­nescence to determine the age of burnt tools associated with the fossil.

“Before the Misliya fossil the earliest known human fossils outside of Africa were 100,000 years old,” Quam said. “This pushes that back by at least 75,000 years.”

He added that along with the recent discovery of the oldest human fossil in Africa dating to about 300,000 years ago, and genetic analysis that shows Neandertha­ls were mating with humans at least 220,000 years ago, the new find suggests the story of human evolution and migration goes back much further than anyone realized.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States