Baltimore Sun Sunday

A missed opportunit­y Our view:

Hogan should not abandon the idea that the government workforce at State Center can be used as a catalyst for a transforma­tive developmen­t in Baltimore

-

here’s a curious omission in the 103-page Maryland Stadium Authority report on possible redevelopm­ent of the State Center complex in Baltimore that Gov. Larry Hogan released last week — any mention whatsoever of the 3,000-plus state employees who work there and what might become of them. Sure, the governor touted the report’s conclusion­s about the potential for retail, offices, restaurant­s and a grocery store — though unimpressi­ve versions of them all, if you actually read the report — and took some shots at the group of developers now in litigation with the state after Mr. Hogan and the other members of the Board of Public works pulled the plug on a decade of efforts to remake the site. But about the state employees working in crumbling buildings whose needs started this whole conversati­on way back in the Ehrlich administra­tion? Not a peep.

When asked about that, a spokesman for the governor reiterated Mr. Hogan’s pledge that the workers will remain in Baltimore. But there’s a big difference between keeping them somewhere in the city and using their presence to leverage a transforma­tive project on what may be Baltimore’s most promising site for transit-oriented developmen­t. The study considers the commercial potential for a 28 acre site at the intersecti­on of Howard Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard as if the buildings were vacant. It doesn’t consider at all the costs and drawbacks of moving the public employees elsewhere, whether it’s to a new building the state constructs or to existing office space somewhere else. And it most certainly does not consider whether, by pledging to keep them there, the state could drasticall­y improve the market conditions and attract investment on a scale that would otherwise be untenable.

Without the state workers on site, here’s what the consultant­s who prepared the report for the Maryland Stadium Authority think State Center might be good for: fast food restaurant­s, a convenienc­e store or gas station, a mid-rise building of doctors’ offices or perhaps senior care, a strip mall, an apartment building and a 25,000-squarefoot grocery store. Mr. Hogan says he’s really excited about that last

Tone, but to put it in context, the Giant in Hampden is about twice that size and the Harris Teeter in Locust Point is nearly three times as big. The original State Center plan called for a 91,000-square-foot showpiece grocery store in the Armory building.

What made the grander vision for State Center possible was a public-private partnershi­p in which the state agreed to long-term leases of office space for its workers. That (along with some state and local tax breaks) made the project financiall­y viable for the developer and also created a built-in market for higher-quality retail and other amenities. The plan also had the benefit of having been shaped through years of community engagement by the developers and the state and enjoyed widespread support among the diverse neighborho­ods that border the property.

Critics of the deal argued that the price the state agreed to pay for the leases was too high. Others questioned whether the deal would have been construed by bond rating agencies as pushing Maryland over its self-imposed debt limit. We believed that complicati­on was surmountab­le and that the costs to the state were reasonable given the benefits, the price of inaction — the existing buildings are rapidly deteriorat­ing and cost a fortune to maintain — and the lack of better options.

Governor Hogan is free to conclude that the original deal was bad for the state. He can rage against the developers for holding matters up in court as they seek compensati­on for their expenditur­es under their now-voided contracts. He can say the project was too grandiose and would never have worked. But none of that changes the fact that the basic concept of using the state’s presence to spur higher-quality developmen­t is a sound one. The governor’s spokesman says he has not conclusive­ly rejected that idea, but it sure doesn’t sound like he’s leaning toward it. Maybe Mr. Hogan will entice someone to save a government worker-free State Center site from being a giant black hole in the middle of the city by building some class-B offices, a McDonald’s, a Royal Farms and — dare to dream! — an Applebee’s. But it would be a tragic missed opportunit­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States