Baltimore Sun Sunday

Let there be LED light

Efficient bulbs will pay for themselves in a few months

- By Elisabeth Leamy

When Jason Chroman relocated from San Francisco to the suburbs, he and his family moved into a bigger, newer house. It was all very exciting until their first electric bill arrived.

“The house was maybe 30 percent bigger, but the electric bill was something like 200 percent more,” Chroman said. So he started looking around to figure out what could be using so much power.

He found the answer when he looked up: “Because it was a new house, it had a lot of recessed lighting, all of which was incandesce­nt.”

Chroman is the vice president of finance at a Silicon Valley startup called Tubular Labs, so he put his money skills to work at home. The question: Since LED lightbulbs cost more but use less energy, how soon would they pay for themselves? He was surprised to find that because of California’s high energy prices, he could recoup his costs in less than two months.

“When I figured out the economics of each bulb, I upgraded all the bulbs in the house,” Chroman said. “It cost me a bundle, but my power bill went down by about half. I was blown away by how much electricit­y lighting consumes.”

The federal government caught on to the high cost and energy consumptio­n of lighting in 2007 and passed a law decreeing that lightbulbs must be three times more efficient by 2020. Congress didn’t outlaw the old-fashioned “Edison” lightbulbs, so named because it’s what we’ve used since inventor Thomas Edison’s time. But it may as well have, because no incandesce­nt bulb comes anywhere close to meeting the new standard. States then had the choice to accelerate the change, and California moved ahead. Starting Jan. 1, California retailers must exhaust their supply of incandesce­nts and then sell only bulbs that meet the new standard, which means LEDs and compact fluorescen­t lightbulbs. The rest of the nation will follow in two years.

Chroman’s home is big and his power rate high, but the numbers are compelling even for an average home, which uses 40 lightbulbs. The average rate for electricit­y is 13 cents per kilowatt hour. If all 40 lightbulbs were 75 watt incandesce­nt, which is pretty typical, you could convert to 11 watt LEDs to get the same amount of light.

Here’s the math for using incandesce­nts versus LEDs if you leave 40 lights on five hours a day: 75-watt incandesce­nt, $1.46; 11-watt LED, $0.21 75-watt incandesce­nt, $58.40; 11-watt LED, $8.40

75-watt incandesce­nt, $700.80; 11-watt LED, $100.80

In this scenario, homeowners would save $600 a year by switching lightbulbs from incandesce­nt to LED.

Prices vary, but let’s say the difference in cost between a basic LED and an incandesce­nt bulb is $4. According to the math above, the monthly usage savings for a single bulb is $1.25. So most people will be able to recoup the cost of a new LED bulb in just over three months.

LEDs can save not only money but time, with fewer trips to the store and up the ladder, since they last about 25,000 hours. That’s more than 13 years, if you keep your lights on five hours a day, as in the example above. Incandesce­nt bulbs last just 1,200 hours; compact fluorescen­ts, 8,000 hours.

Not all LEDs are created equal. To know you are purchasing LEDs with the maximum benefits, look for the Energy Star label. This means they meet standards for brightness, color quality, efficiency, steadiness and immediate lighting.

 ?? TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE ?? LEDs can save homeowners not only money but time, with fewer trips to the store and up the ladder, because the lightbulbs tend to last about 25,000 hours.
TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE LEDs can save homeowners not only money but time, with fewer trips to the store and up the ladder, because the lightbulbs tend to last about 25,000 hours.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States