Baltimore Sun Sunday

MEDICINE&SCIENCE

Baltimores­un.com/marylandhe­alth

-

the three years even as hospital spending declined.

In the earlier years of Maryland’s system, independen­t researcher­s found mixed results for savings.

Maryland’s global budgets saved Medicare $293 million — 1.8 percent of total Medicare spending — in 2014 and 2015, research firm RTI Internatio­nal reported in August.

A separate paper from a team led by Eric Roberts at the University of Pittsburgh found that Maryland’s program in those years couldn’t be clearly credited for reducing hospital use.

The system’s advocates say several years of results are needed to show it’s working.

“These are not fake savings,” said Joseph Antos, an economist at the conservati­veleaning American Enterprise Institute who sits on Maryland’s Health Services Cost Review Commission. “It didn’t happen instantane­ously. It’s taken this number of years to achieve the kinds of savings that you see” for 2016 and beyond.

Even boosters such as Joshua Sharfstein, the former Maryland health secretary who oversaw the creation of the global budgets and got approval for them from the Obama administra­tion, say the system is far from perfect or finalized.

“There is a range of responses. Some hospitals have been able to do more than others,” said Sharfstein, now an associate dean at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore. “Change in health care is notoriousl­y slow.”

Hospitals have lagged in delivering primary, preventive care to people with chronic conditions such as asthma, diabetes and heart failure, especially in low-income neighborho­ods.

Maryland’s system does little to control soaring costs of drugs or nursing home care, doctors’ office treatments and other care not connected to hospitals, although policymake­rs are developing proposals to do both.

Even so, “what Maryland has done is just so far ahead of many of these other models” to try to control costs, said Dan D’Orazio, a management consultant who has worked with hospitals across the country. One Maryland hospital CEO told him: “This has fundamenta­lly changed how we wake up and do business every day,” D’Orazio said.

At Mercy, described by policymake­rs as more aggressive than many hospitals in watching costs, about a third of the patients now leave the hospital with medication­s in hand, said Dr. Wilma Rowe, the hospital’s chief medical officer. That bypasses the tendency for patients to skip a follow-up pharmacy visit and risk landing back in the emergency room.

A statewide data network notifies Mercy and other hospitals when one of their patients ends up in an emergency room somewhere else. That helps coordinate care.

Greater Baltimore Medical Center, north of the city, has hired dozens of primary care doctors to track around 1,000 people with diabetes, staying in touch, advising on diets and keeping them on insulin so they avoid the hospital.

Often clinicians visit elderly patients’ homes to prevent what might turn into an ambulance call and admission, said the hospital’s CEO, Dr. John Chessare.

Before global budgets, “I’d look at the waiting room in the [emergency department], and if it wasn’t full I’d get scared,” he said.

Now he worries it might be full of people who could be better treated elsewhere — including Gilchrist, a GBMC affiliate delivering hospice care for those at the end of life.

These days, Chessare said, “we consider it a defect if someone with chronic disease dies in the hospital.”

 ?? AMY DAVIS/BALTIMORE SUN ?? A statewide system of pushing hospitals to reduce admissions has generated hundreds of millions of dollars in savings for the taxpayers, employers and others who ultimately pay the bills, a new report shows.
AMY DAVIS/BALTIMORE SUN A statewide system of pushing hospitals to reduce admissions has generated hundreds of millions of dollars in savings for the taxpayers, employers and others who ultimately pay the bills, a new report shows.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States