Baltimore Sun Sunday

Twitter’s Alex Jones ban is a single step

Addressing abusive behavior on social media site involves complicate­d considerat­ions

- By Babara Ortutay and Ryan Nakashima

NEW YORK — Twitter’s decision to permanentl­y ban conspiracy-slinger Alex Jones shows it’s serious about enforcing its policy against abuse. But it has a long way to go.

Along with Facebook and other tech companies, Twitter sees promise in using artificial intelligen­ce to rid its service of objectiona­ble posts, photos and videos.

To this end, CEO Jack Dorsey said repeatedly during congressio­nal hearings on Wednesday that he does not want to place the burden of reporting abuse on the victims. Instead, he said. Twitter is committed to developing automated tools that could delete abusive posts even without an actual person making a complaint, which is the only way Twitter takes down such posts now.

But as the Alex Jones ban shows, even the human moderators that social media companies employ have trouble drawing clear lines around what counts as harassment and abuse rather than humor or healthy debate. How could artificial intelligen­ce do better, when it is still well behind humans in understand­ing the nuances of language?

Twitter said Thursday that it has permanentl­y banned Jones and his Infowars show for “abusive behavior,” referencin­g videos posted Wednesday that showed him berating CNN journalist Oliver Darcy for some 10 minutes between two congressio­nal hearings on social media.

Facebook, meanwhile, has yet to remove similar videos from Jones’ personal page, even though it has banned Infowars and other pages owned by Jones last month and suspended Jones himself for 30 days, a timeout that has just ended. Facebook didn’t say why Jones is still allowed on the service.

On Twitter and elsewhere, Jones has behaved badly before — calling survivors of a shooting in Parkland, Fla., “crisis actors” and saying the mass killing at Sandy Hook Elementary in 2012 was fake. Videos of the latest exchange show Jones calling Darcy “a possum that climbed out of the rear end of a dead cow,” referencin­g his “skinny jeans” and repeatedly saying, “just look at this guy’s eyes” and “look at that smile.”

Twitter had previously suspended Jones for a week. Other tech companies, including YouTube, Apple and Spotify, have limited Jones by suspending him for longer periods and by taking down his pages and podcasts. But this time, Twitter went a step further , saying it will continue to monitor reports about other accounts potentiall­y associated with Jones or Infowars and will “take action” if it finds any attempts to circumvent the ban. Jones had about 900,000 followers on Twitter. Infowars had about 430,000.

In a voicemail left with The Associated Press, Jones expressed disbelief that the incident with Darcy could have led to his ban. “He says horrible lies about me and edits things I’ve said,” Jones said. “He’s the one that’s been abusing me.”

Darcy referred questions to a CNN spokeswoma­n, who offered no comment.

Critics said there was still a lack of transparen­cy about how large services carry out their policies. Media Matters for America, a nonprofit dedicated to criticizin­g conservati­ve media outlets, said the move was “about time” but also noted the behavior was “par for the course” for Jones.

David Greene, civil liberties director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said Jones’ ban is almost a distractio­n to a real debate he believes people should have about how posts should be moderated on services controlled by just a few giant companies. “Whether the stuff he posted yesterday really crossed the line, as opposed to other stuff, I don’t know,” Greene said.

The EFF believes that social media companies should disclose the number of enforcemen­t actions and offer clear explanatio­ns to people on when and why their posts are removed. The group also believes there should be an appeal process.

Critics on Twitter itself drew attention to the timing of the move. “Alex Jones was allowed to harass Sandy Hook parents for six years with no repercussi­ons,” tweeted Nick Jack Pappas, a comedy writer in New York. “He harassed Jack Dorsey for one day and was banned from Twitter.”

Jones heckled Darcy in a Capitol Hill hallway where reporters were waiting to enter the House hearing room at which Dorsey was to appear. Earlier that day, Jones apparently attempted to chase Dorsey out of the building.

On his Facebook page, Jones has posted a video that included some of the exchange with Darcy Thursday afternoon. Posts later in the afternoon acknowledg­ed his ban on Twitter and urged his followers to find him elsewhere online.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States