Baltimore Sun Sunday

Special education legal fight is fraught

Maryland parents lose over 85% vs. districts

- By Talia Richman

It’s rare for the parents of students with disabiliti­es to prevail in legal battles against Maryland school districts. In the past five years, they’ve lost more than 85 percent of the time, state education department documents show, even after investing tens of thousands of dollars and countless hours in pursuit of a better education for their children.

Advocates, families and attorneys say the trend is alarming and discourage­s people from fighting for the rights that kids are guaranteed under federal law.

School systems are required to provide and pay for a range of specialize­d services — anything from speech therapy sessions to tuition at a private facility — to ensure that children with disabiliti­es are properly educated. When parents dispute what’s being offered, they can file a complaint and take their case before a judge.

It’s a draining and complex ordeal that costs families time and energy and leaves their children’s education in flux. In recent years, roughly 100 families have gone through a so-called special education due process hearing.

Judges have routinely sided with the school systems.

“I wouldn’t wish this upon anybody,” said Sarah Friedman, a

parent who went through due process. “My daughter was let down first by the school system and then by the judicial system.”

Advocates say the odds discourage countless other families — especially lowincome families — from attempting to go through with a due process complaint.

“Families see the data, and it’s like, why would we even try?” said Maureen van Stone, director of the Kennedy Krieger Institute’s Project HEAL, a medical-legal partnershi­p.

“This is not what you want when children with disabiliti­es are guaranteed these rights by federal law.”

Other states avoid such asymmetric­al rates. A study examining due process hearings in Texas found districts prevailed in roughly 72 percent of cases from 2011 to 2015. A similar assessment in Massachuse­tts found school districts won in a little more than half of the due process hearings over eight years.

Van Stone said she understand­s “not every case is a winner.” Still, she argues the lopsided success in Maryland should sound alarms.

A representa­tive of the judges who oversee these cases said every judge is impartial and assesses each situation on its merits.

A senior official in the school system that fields the most complaints said districts work tirelessly to settle problems outside court to best serve kids.

Still, some parents question why they so often lose in the fight for what they see as their children’s legal right to “a free and appropriat­e” public education — and why lawmakers in Annapolis have quashed legislatio­n they say would’ve helped level the playing field.

A last resort

 ?? KIM HAIRSTON/BALTIMORE SUN ?? Maureen van Stone is the director of the Maryland Center for Developmen­tal Disabiliti­es at the Kennedy Krieger Institute and the director of Project HEAL (Health, Education, Advocacy, and Law). Project HEAL found that when parents of children with disabiliti­es wage legal battle on behalf of their children against Maryland school districts, they loose more than 85 percent of the time.
KIM HAIRSTON/BALTIMORE SUN Maureen van Stone is the director of the Maryland Center for Developmen­tal Disabiliti­es at the Kennedy Krieger Institute and the director of Project HEAL (Health, Education, Advocacy, and Law). Project HEAL found that when parents of children with disabiliti­es wage legal battle on behalf of their children against Maryland school districts, they loose more than 85 percent of the time.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States