Baltimore Sun Sunday

Biden directive focuses on issues important to travelers

- By Ed Perkins eperkins@mind.net

President Biden issued marching orders July 9 to more than a dozen federal department­s and agencies: Make sure the U.S. economy is and remains fully competitiv­e. His executive order covered the entire spectrum of federal authority, including quite a few items that involve travelers. Most specifical­ly, the order tells Department of Transporta­tion Secretary Pete Buttigieg to get busy on several issues of important to air travelers. Among the most important:

Reconstitu­te the Department’s Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection (ACACP) to ensure, among its several objectives, fair representa­tion for consumers.

Report on enforcemen­t of rules that require airlines to issue refunds for flights they canceled due to COVID-19.

Propose a rule that airlines refund checked-baggage and other fees for services they didn’t actually deliver: bags not delivered on time, seat-assignment fees for canceled flights, and such.

Promote enhanced transparen­cy in flight informatio­n and, specifical­ly, ensure consumers aren’t exposed to deception.

Make sure consumers have full informatio­n on ancillary fees at the time they purchase tickets.

Make sure the DoT is ready for new technologi­es — especially low-altitude personal and unmanned aircraft — that pose a substantia­l challenge to local airspace management.

In general, require that DoT, alone and in coordinati­on with other agencies, provide vigilant oversight over all market participan­ts in travel.

Historical­ly, DoT oversight has been pretty good on many consumer air travel issues — it has provided far more protection for air travelers than are available at any level to hotel guests, car renters and cruise passengers. Neverthele­ss, the order leaves a few issues incomplete:

Although it got off to a slow start, DoT has done a pretty good job of getting airlines to issue refunds for flights they canceled before travelers did because of COVID-19. But it has ignored the plight of travelers who canceled first and at the time were given the stark choice: time-limited and highly restricted vouchers/future credits or nothing.

Although rules requiring full-fare advertisin­g have been a huge consumer benefit, current policy does allow airlines to exclude highly deceptive mandatory hotel fees from posted air-hotel package prices.

The delayed-baggage refund requiremen­t, as currently under considerat­ion, doesn’t reflect air travel reality. It calls for a refund when a delayed bag is not delivered within 24 hours (some sources say 12), but anyone who has ever missed a checked bag knows that the hassle starts immediatel­y — as soon as it becomes evident that the bag has not arrived on the passenger’s flight. That’s when the refund should kick in, not hours later.

The order does not address the hot-button issue of assuring family seating together without requiring seat-assignment fees. It may not strictly be a “competitio­n” issue, but it certainly is an important issue that DoT needs to address.

Although DoT is involved with rail as well as air travel, the order includes only one provision related to passenger rail: Enforce on-time performanc­e requiremen­ts for railroads hosting Amtrak trains.

I can report an immediate favorable developmen­t: a new ACACP consumer representa­tive. The previous representa­tive did not pass Leo Rosten’s test, “By a consumer advocate is he/ she a consumer advocate?” but the new one clearly does.

All in all, there’s a lot for consumers to like in Biden’s new order — if

DoT follows through. As a former naval officer, Buttigieg knows how to respond to orders from the commander-in-chief. For the most part, we consumer advocates will cheer him on in his efforts, while continuing to press DoT on the issues that the order does not cover, most notably no-fee family seating.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ??
DREAMSTIME

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States