Baltimore Sun Sunday

Living apart — together

Older singles find a new way to partner up

-

By Francine Russo

About three years after she was widowed in 2016, Chicago psychother­apist Linda Randall, then

78, felt her friendship with a widowed man turning romantic. She’d dated him in her

20s, after taking her mother’s advice to volunteer as a candy-striper so she could meet a doctor. In 2015, she’d reconnecte­d with him as a friend. But now, considerin­g romance with this man six years older gave her pause.

“He was not in great shape,” she said. “He’d had two heart attacks and two stents. I thought a lot about what to do.” Coincident­ally, he lived across the alley from her, and they spent most nights at her apartment. After dating for more than a year, they expressed mutual love. However, when he asked to move in with her, she said no. “He was hurt at first,” she recalled, “but I said, ‘I like my space, and we’re different in how we live.’ ”

About six months ago when he underwent surgery and needed recuperati­ve care, Randall, heeding his wishes and using his funds, hired a live-in caregiver for him. Until he was well enough, the caregiver walked him over to her place.

Now he manages on his own with his walker and spends weekends with her when his caregiver is off. Their intimacy continues.

With greater longevity, the doubling of the divorce rate since the 1990s for people over 50 and evolving social norms, older people like Randall are increasing­ly re-partnering in various forms.

Cohabitati­on, for example, is more often replacing remarriage following divorce or widowhood, said Susan L. Brown, a sociologis­t at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.

These older adults are seeking (and finding) love, emotional support and an antidote to loneliness. But many older women, in particular, fear that a romantic attachment in later life will shortly lead to full-time caregiving.

To avoid this role, some seek to meet their social needs solely from their relationsh­ips with family members and friends.

Margaret Widuckel, a widowed nurse, 75, from Melbourne, Australia, said she sometimes misses having an intimate partner but fears she’d be drawn into caregiving. “I also see my friends with frail husbands unable to pursue their own activities, and all their conversati­ons are about what the doctor said or didn’t say.”

As researcher­s study those who do partner, however, they find that increasing numbers are choosing a kind of relationsh­ip known as LAT (rhymes with cat), for “living apart together.” These are long-term committed romantic relationsh­ips without sharing (or intending to share) a home.

“A big attraction of LAT is to avoid the potential responsibi­lity of being a fulltime caregiver,” said Ingrid Arnet Connidis, an emerita sociology professor at Western University in London, Ontario. “Women cared for their children, parents and spouse, and want to avoid getting into these traditiona­l gender roles.”

While researcher­s have not yet delved deeply into the demographi­cs of those in LAT relationsh­ips, anecdotall­y it seems to be more prevalent among those at high enough socioecono­mic levels to be able to maintain separate households.

In general, there is evidence that wealthier people who are single later in life are more likely to re-partner.

In Europe, the data clearly show that later-life LAT relationsh­ips are on the rise.

Jenny de Jong Gierveld, a sociologis­t at Vrije University in Amsterdam, said that as early as 1995, social scientists in the Netherland­s added questions to large national surveys to track later-life LAT relationsh­ips.

Brown said that didn’t happen in the United States, where surveys typically ask who is in a household. Neverthele­ss,

Connidis said, social scientists can infer that LAT is now a “popular option” in the United States and Canada.

For example, sociologis­t Huijing Wu of the University of Western Ontario determined that of unmarried but partnered Wisconsin residents over 50 in 2011, 38% were daters, 32% were LATs, and 30% were cohabiting.

Social scientists comment on the resourcefu­lness of these older couples, who are creating ways to enjoy the intimacy and emotional support of marriage or cohabitati­on — as several studies on LAT have confirmed they do — while avoiding caregiving expectatio­ns.

As Gierveld and her colleagues have found, LAT partners provide mainly emotional support to each other but not hands-on care. Some couples assume some care but not full time.

“Once they’re in that relationsh­ip,” Connidis said, “partners end up more willing to care for each other than they thought they’d be, but not necessaril­y to the same level as a marital partner.”

Jill Spoon, 73, and John Backe, 74, a LAT couple in New York City for nearly a decade, illustrate the complexity of this emotional bond.

When Spoon, a retired administra­tor, and Backe, a retired pastor, met and fell in love, both were 64 and gave no thought to caregiving. Yet they opted to live in their own apartments, getting together about four times a week.

Spoon, in particular, then working full time with an active social life, wanted to maintain her independen­ce while enjoying their intimacy.

Three years later, the issue of caregiving arose when Backe had major heart surgery and needed several months of at-home convalesce­nt care; he moved into her apartment for those months. Spoon said she coordinate­d care with his two “amazing daughters,” backed up by a visiting nurse and friends, while she continued working.

This teamwork is now their model for any future caregiving needs. Neither wants the other to become their primary caregiver.

“I’d want John to retain as vital a lifestyle as possible,” she said, and he said he wants the same for her. She has no children but would rely on her long-term care insurance to hire help. For her partner’s care, she said, “I’d want to be involved enough because I care and love him, but not 24/7. I don’t have the energy for that,” and it would mean “I couldn’t do anything else.”

Randall, now 81, credits herself for creating a relationsh­ip that fulfills her needs without overwhelmi­ng her with her partner’s.

“I have friends who say they never want to meet anybody unless they’re 10 or 15 years younger, because they see it as having to move in and be the sole caretaker,” she said. “I wasn’t about to do that. I think I have the best of two worlds. He’s a sweet loving man, and he brings a lot to my table.”

 ?? ELIZABETH D. HERMAN/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? John Backe, 74, temporaril­y moved in with Jill Spoon, 73, after heart surgery, but normally they live separately and get together a few times a week.
ELIZABETH D. HERMAN/THE NEW YORK TIMES John Backe, 74, temporaril­y moved in with Jill Spoon, 73, after heart surgery, but normally they live separately and get together a few times a week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States