Baltimore Sun Sunday

Who should manage water and sewage service in Baltimore?

-

The failure of Baltimore’s Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant, Maryland’s single largest sewage treatment plant, to meet the terms of its discharge permit has caused the state to order a temporary takeover of the Dundalk facility. City officials had received no shortage of warnings about the plant’s polluted discharge when Maryland Environmen­t Secretary Ben Grumbles announced the unpreceden­ted move last Sunday. Even Mayor Brandon Scott acknowledg­ed there are long-standing problems at the city-run plant that have resulted in massive discharges causing elevated bacteria and nutrient loads not only in local waters but ultimately the Chesapeake Bay into which the river flows.

Secretary Grumbles decision to have the Maryland Environmen­tal Service intervene at the city’s cost was well justified under the circumstan­ces. And, at the very least, it demonstrat­ed exactly what one expects of a state regulatory agency — transparen­cy and oversight in the public interest.

The question for Back River is: What’s next? Surely, MES can adequately identify the needs not only at Back River but for Baltimore’s other wastewater treatment facility, the Patapsco Plant at Wagner’s Point. It, too, has gotten criticized for illegal discharges before, not only by the state but from environmen­tal advocates like Blue Water Baltimore. The more fundamenta­l question is whether Baltimore, a city with enormous needs beyond such public infrastruc­ture, ought to be entrusted with sole authority to run the public water and sewer system not only for the city but for Baltimore County.

Privatizat­ion has been discussed before, and it’s a non-starter. Two years ago, city voters wisely approved a ban on water privatizat­ion, fearful that a loss of public control would result in higher billings, particular­ly for low-income city residents. But a failure to keep up with needed maintenanc­e along with some atrocious billing problems that have resulted in some customers charged too much and some not at all (including a stunning $2.3 million freebie to the Ritz-Carlton

Residences, according to a recently-reported audit of the city’s Department of Public Works) does not inspire confidence in city oversight.

But there is a third possibilit­y. What about a regional authority structured along the lines of the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, which has since 1918 managed water and sewer service for Prince George’s and Montgomery counties? This would keep the vital service in public hands, but it would also offer a fresh start with, presumably, some additional funding from state and federal sources.

There is even a certain historic connection there. One of the individual­s instrument­al in launching the WSSC a century ago was none other than Abel Wolman, the Baltimore-born and Johns Hopkins-trained engineer whose groundbrea­king research led to standardiz­ed chlorinati­on of drinking water, vastly improving public health.

Clearly, there would still be challenges. Aging urban water and sewer lines still require substantia­l investment no matter who runs the system. Both Baltimore and Baltimore County are already committed to spending at least $1.6 billion for system upgrades. But it’s not unreasonab­le to expect the Hogan administra­tion or its successor to provide some “carrots” and not just “sticks” toward improving water quality, especially given the willingnes­s of late to shower money on all sorts of purposes thanks to a budget surplus that seems to be burning a hole in State House pockets. It would also require, of course, some level of trust between city elected leaders and their counterpar­ts in Towson as well.

All that seems entirely possible, but it would be prudent to study the matter further. We would urge Mayor Scott and Baltimore County Executive Johnny Olszewski Jr. to consider doing just that — and as soon as possible. If cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay requires cleaning up Back River, maybe cleaning up how best to administer water and sewage service in the Baltimore region ought to be part of the solution too.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States