Baltimore Sun

Immigratio­n stew

Our view: Trump hits the reset button on policy again and again and again

-

Today is a red-letter day for Republican presidenti­al nominee Donald Trump as he unveils — or perhaps the better word is “clarifies” — his position on immigratio­n in what has been billed as a major policy address in Arizona. If recent history is any guide, it should prove tough and soft, clear and opaque, unforgivin­g and humane. In other words, good luck figuring out where the reality TV star stands since he’s likely to dramatical­ly change his position, or have it reinterpre­ted by his minions, in the days and weeks that follow.

Rarely has a presidenti­al candidate flip-flopped on an issue, particular­ly one that has been identified as a cornerston­e of his campaign, as thoroughly as Mr. Trump has done on illegal immigratio­n. During the GOP primaries, he was a hard-core proponent of building a wall along the nation’s southern border and deporting all 11 million people who have entered the country illegally by whatever means necessary. In recent weeks, he has been “softening” — the very word he has used to describe it and more than once — with talk of not engaging a “deportatio­n force” and setting “humane” priorities that focus on deporting the “bad ones.”

Yet, particular­ly when appearing on conservati­ve media like shows on the Fox News network, he has insisted that he’s not flip-flopping at all. One day he talks about the “very powerful wall” that he will build and that he is not open to any pathway to legalizati­on. Within hours, he gives a speech in Iowa describing immigratio­n as a “civil rights issue” and says he doesn’t intend to deport everyone who has entered the country illegally after all. Later, there is talk from a Trump adviser of a “virtual wall” instead of bricks and mortar, a claim the campaign later disavows.

Serving as a spokespers­on for the Trump campaign clearly requires the flexibilit­y of a Simone Biles at her Olympic best. On Sunday, Mr. Trump’s running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, said on CNN that the ticket’s position has been consistent: “Let’s be clear, nothing has changed about Donald Trump’s position on dealing with illegal immigratio­n,” Mr. Pence said. Yet on a similar Sunday morning talk show on Fox, Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway conceded that a deportatio­n force (a talking point in the primaries) has been dropped. On NBC, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus suggested that the Trumpimmig­ration policy was still being banged out but predicted it would prove “tough,” “fair” and “humane.”

Here’s our reading of the tea leaves: Mr. Trump wants to take a position on immigratio­n that will get him elected president. The extremist views he espoused during the primary season won’t get the job done, so he’s simply trying to sound tough while signaling to the Hispanic community and independen­t voters that he hears their concerns as well. In his speech, he’ll likely toss around the usual anti-immigratio­n rhetoric — like opposing “amnesty” — without necessaril­y revealing what will happen to those 11 million souls living in the shadows.

Considerin­g the candidate’s disdain for policy specifics, this level of imprecisio­n and prevaricat­ion should come rather easily. His recent outreach to African-American voters has been similarly devoid of substance, often insulting and seemingly more focused on lessening his reputation for racism than actually soliciting support from black voters. Typical was his social media posting accusing Hillary Clinton of being a “bigot” because she once described the late Sen. Robert Byrd as a “mentor” while serving in the U.S. Senate. The West Virginia senator was once a supporter of the Ku Klux Klan (not to mention a civil rights opponent) until he had a change of heart decades ago. Had David Duke and other pro-Trump white supremacis­ts similarly renounced their racist views, Mr. Trump might deserve the benefit of the doubt as well.

That’s not to suggest, a bit of flip-flopping wouldn’t serve Mr. Trump well. His positions on immigratio­n, particular­ly those from the early days of his campaign when he equated Mexicans with rapists, have often been shameful. But how could anyone possibly believe him now? As even die-hard conservati­ve talk show host Rush Limbaugh observed this week, Mr. Trump can’t be taken seriously on the subject of immigratio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States