Baltimore Sun

Divestment is a costly, empty gesture

- Jeff Eshelman, Washington, D.C. The writer is a senior vice president of the Independen­t Petroleum Associatio­n of America.

A recent editorial (“An atmosphere of neglect,” Oct. 20) ignores the high cost and ineffectiv­eness of fossil fuel divestment.

Research finds the transactio­n and management fees related to divestment can rob endowment funds of as much as12 percent of their total value over a 20-year time frame. According to the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, “Divestment bears the risk of adversely affecting an investment portfolio and severs any chance to advance positive change through shareholde­r advocacy.” The Vermont Treasury also found divestment would cost their state pension funds $10 million per year in lost returns. Meanwhile, divestment has no tangible impact on the environmen­t, including no effect on targeted companies, their market value or practices.

Maryland should focus on policies that actually support the environmen­t, not empty political gestures like divestment. Lawmakers should uphold their fiduciary responsibi­lity and make responsibl­e choices that benefit the pension funds our hard-working state employees rely on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States