Baltimore Sun

Priebus appointed White House chief of staff

Trump also names Bannon, a Breitbart news executive, to role of chief strategist

- By Jonathan Lemire and Laurie Kellman

WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald Trump made his first two key personnel appointmen­ts on Sunday, one an overture to Republican circles by naming GOP chief Reince Priebus as his White House chief of staff, the other a shot across the bow of the Washington establishm­ent by tabbing Breitbart news executive Stephen Bannon as chief strategist and senior counselor.

The two men had made up the president-elect’s chief of staff shortlist, and while Priebus received that job, Bannon’s post also is expected to wield significan­t clout. The media executive with Bannon ties to the alt-right and white nationalis­t movement was given top billing in the press release announcing their appointmen­ts.

Trump’s hires were, at first glance, contradict­ory, though they fit a pattern of the celebrity businessma­n creating a veritable Rorschach test that allowed his supporters to see what they wanted. Priebus, who lashed the Republican National Committee to Trump this summer despite some intraparty objections, is a GOP operative with deep expertise of the Washington establishm­ent that Trump has vowed to shake up. He has close ties to House Speaker Paul Ryan, a fellow Wisconsini­te.

“I am very grateful to the president-elect for this opportunit­y to serve him and this nation as we work to create an economy that works for everyone, secure our borders, repeal and replace Obamacare and destroy radical Islamic terrorism,” Priebus said in the statement announcing his appointmen­t.

Bannon, meanwhile, helped transform the Breitbart news site into the leading mouthpiece of the party’s anti-establishm­ent wing.

“Steve and Reince are highly qualified leaders who worked well together on our campaign and led us to a historic victory,” Trump said.

Neither Priebus nor Bannon bring policy experience to their new White House roles. Chiefs of staff in particular play a significan­t role in policy making, serving as a liaison to Cabinet agencies and deciding what informatio­n makes it to the president’s desk. They’re often one of the last people in the room with the president as major decisions are made.

Trump’s adult children, who serve as influentia­l advisers to the president-elect, are said to have been concerned about having a controvers­ial figure in the chief of staff role and backed Priebus for the job.

In announcing the appointmen­ts, Trump said Priebus and Bannon would work as “equal partners” — effectivel­y creating two power centers in the West Wing.

Trump has long encouraged rivalries, both in business and in his presidenti­al campaign. He cycled through three campaign managers during his White House run, creating a web of competing alliances among staffers.

Priebus is a traditiona­l choice, one meant as an olive branch to the Republican­s who control both houses of Congress as Trump looks to pass his legislativ­e agenda.

Ryan tweeted, “I’m very proud and excited for my friend (at)Reince. Congrats!” Ryan made no mention of Bannon in that tweet, but earlier told CNN that he didn’t know Bannon but “I trust Donald’s judgment.”

The Bannon pick, however, is anything but safe.

Under Bannon’s tenure, Brietbart pushed a nationalis­t agenda and became one of the leading outlets of the so-called alt-right — a movement often associated with white supremacis­t ideas that oppose multicultu­ralism and defend “Western values.”

John Weaver, a Republican strategist who worked for Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s presidenti­al campaign, tweeted: “The racist, fascist extreme right is represente­d footsteps from the Oval Office. Be very vigilant, America.”

Bannon, who became campaign CEO in August, pushed Trump to adopt more populist rhetoric and paint rival Hillary Clinton as part of a global conspiracy made up of the political, financial and media elite, bankers bent on oppressing the country’s working people — a message that carried Trump to the White House but to some, carried anti-Semitic undertones.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States