Baltimore Sun

A Maryland primer on school choice

- By Nancy S. Grasmick Nancy S. Grasmick is a presidenti­al scholar at Towson University and a former Maryland superinten­dent of schools. Her email is ngrasmick@towson.edu.

One education issue, school choice, took a prominent place during this election year debate. But what exactly is school choice, and can it be implemente­d in a way that is beneficial to all students, educators and communitie­s? Maryland is often called “America in Miniature.” Maryland’s experience with school choice might provide a primer for the rest of the nation.

Maryland has had a long history with holding schools accountabl­e for student achievemen­t. Over two decades ago, Maryland, and then the federal government, began mandating school options for students in low-performing schools. For example, under certain circumstan­ces, parents were given the choice to transfer their children to higher-performing schools. While one might think this would be an attractive opportunit­y for parents, very few transfers were requested. The reality was that parents sought to keep their children in their neighborho­od school, often the same school the parents attended. Parents were unwilling to have their children, especially elementary school-age children, transporte­d to other neighborho­ods. Safety was a main concern. In Maryland’s urban districts, parents have supported strengthen­ing community schools and opening charter schools as better choice options.

In Maryland, charter schools are public schools that are typically operated by third parties. Charter schools are given authority to implement innovative programs and teaching methods. Most charter schools are open to all students, often through a lottery system. The most successful charter schools are those that have grass-roots parent involvemen­t, are able to instill a strong school culture that is embraced by students, teachers, families and partners, and provide expanded learning opportunit­ies. Maryland has over 50 charter schools, the majority of which are elementary/middle schools.

Charter schools at the high school level face challenges. Across the nation, charter high schools are often less attractive to students because they are less likely to be able to provide the variety of academic programs and extracurri­cular athletic and fine arts programs available in most large comprehens­ive public high schools. For high school students, magnet programs show greater promise. Magnet schools are public schools that have specialize­d programs emphasizin­g a consistent theme, curriculum or method of teaching. Magnet schools provide students with choice beyond their zoned schools. In Maryland, the most successful magnet programs have been those that set high admission standards and require competitio­n for enrollment. Schools for the arts and the Internatio­nal Baccalaure­ate programs are perhaps the best known, and most successful type of these magnet programs. However, these programs are not available to every student.

Another type of magnet school is the “themed” high school. These schools attract students with interests in a particular content area such as health sciences, STEM, law and law enforcemen­t, or the design arts. These schools are smaller public high schools, or a school within a school, that serve interested students on a first-come, first-served basis. Because these schools provide students with opportunit­ies to explore their interests, themed schools report increased attendance and graduation rates, and decreased disciplina­ry instances. However, student achievemen­t results are mixed. The most successful themed schools infuse their theme into every academic course. When teachers are content rich in the theme and able to adapt to a nontraditi­onal curriculum, student achievemen­t rises.

In recent years, states have also begun to administer opportunit­y scholarshi­p tax credit programs. These programs allow individual­s and corporatio­ns to allocate a portion of their owed state taxes to private nonprofit organizati­ons that issue scholarshi­ps to K-12 students. The scholarshi­p allows a student to choose among a list of non-public schools, and sometimes public schools outside of the district. Maryland administer­s a “BOOST” program that works with an advisory board to allocate up to $5 million to provide scholarshi­ps for economical­ly disadvanta­ged students to attend non-public schools. In its first year, it is too early to determine whether this program will have a positive impact on student achievemen­t.

Several states have adopted voucher programs. These programs allow economical­ly disadvanta­ged families to have a portion of a non-public school’s tuition covered by state funds. These programs are not open to all students and are limited by the number of seats available in the non-public schools. Maryland does not fund typical school vouchers.

As you can see, school choice covers much ground. Instead of mandating a “one-size-fits-all approach,” students are best served when states and local school districts work collaborat­ively to select and implement the choice options that work best for their students, teachers and communitie­s. I hope Maryland will continue to take this thoughtful approach.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States