Baltimore Sun

‘Real Americans’ fight to preserve the best of U.S. immigratio­n policy

- By Narintohn Luangrath Narintohn Luangrath is a 2016-2017 Fulbright-Schuman Grantee, 2013 Harry S. Truman Scholar, and Boston College alumna. She is currently a Baltimore Corps Fellow in the Baltimore City Health Department. She can be contacted at: narin

In 1975, the Communist Pathet Lao emerged victorious in a civil war that lasted over 20 years. More than 300,000 Laotians fled to neighborin­g Thailand, where they lived in refugee camps before being resettled in other countries. Those who couldn’t escape were often sent to “re-education camps,” where they faced forced labor, torture and execution. Eight thousand miles away, my Laotian father, then an undergradu­ate at the University of Northern Iowa, contemplat­ed his future: As U.S.Lao diplomatic relations quickly deteriorat­ed, his USAID-sponsored academic scholarshi­p was in jeopardy, as was his legal status in the country. Without financial support or a legal right to stay in the U.S., a return to Laos would mean imprisonme­nt in a re-education camp and possibly death.

But our country did the right thing: The Immigratio­n and Naturaliza­tion Service (INS), now the U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services (USCIS), allowed my father to stay, complete his studies and work. While in Iowa, he met my mother, a student from Thailand. They eventually married and moved to Portland, Ore., where they became naturalize­d citizens.

From receiving asylum and humanitari­an protection, to qualifying for green cards and citizenshi­p, members of my family have benefited from a range of services provided by the legacy INS and its supersedin­g agency, USCIS. Eager to give back to my country through public service and to contribute to the work of an agency that made my parents’ lives in the United States possible, I spent the summer after my college graduation in 2014 working as a student trainee at USCIS headquarte­rs, where I provided my colleagues with informatio­n on the gang violence driving unaccompan­ied immigrant children to flee Central America and seek refuge in the U.S.

USCIS provides invaluable services, not just to aspiring citizens like my parents, but also to those who seek humanitari­an protection, or who want to work or study in this country. That’s why I’m dismayed by USCIS’s decision last month to fundamenta­lly reframe its mission. The agency removed a passage that contextual­izes its services as securing “America’s promise as a nation of immigrants” and erased all mention of its responsibi­lity to promote “an awareness and understand­ing of citizenshi­p.”

In a correspond­ing email to his staff, USCIS Director L. Francis Cissna noted that while benefits applicants and petitioner­s should be “treated with the greatest respect and courtesy,” he reminded his colleagues to never forget that they “serve the American people.”

Combined with recent moves to end family reunificat­ion and DACA, changes to the USCIS mission statement underscore the Trump administra­tion’s larger efforts to redefine who counts as American. Thus, Mr. Cissna’s comments imply two things: first, that the interests of “the American people” and those of immigrants applying for benefits or of U.S. citizens petitionin­g for their non-citizen family members are necessaril­y in conflict; and second, that immigrants like my parents — despite living here for over 40 years and successful­ly navigating a long, challengin­g naturaliza­tion process — will never be considered “real Americans” in the eyes of this administra­tion.

While the perpetual foreigner stereotype is often weaponized against nonwhite population­s more broadly, it is most frequently wielded against Asian-Americans, invoking painful historical memories, cutting at their sense of belonging, and intensifyi­ng their feelings of inferiorit­y and isolation. Mr. Cissna’s email, coupled with his changes to the mission statement, conceptual­izes Americanne­ss as a matter of birth and lineage, rather than something to which anyone can aspire. Put more bluntly, his language and actions amount to a dangerous whitewashi­ng of U.S. history.

My father and mother took their oaths of citizenshi­p in 1982 and 1987, respective­ly. And they take their roles as citizens seriously: They vote in local and national elections, attend town halls held by their representa­tives and volunteer in their community. They also know that being an active citizen means speaking out when your government fails to live up to its values and teaching your children to do the same. While the Trump administra­tion continues to otherize and dehumanize immigrants, officials can be assured that “real Americans” like myself and my parents will continue to use the tools we learned as citizens to preserve what’s best about our country.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States