Baltimore Sun

Sex offense evidence bill gains

Disclosure of suspect’s previous offenses expected to pass Senate, House panel

- By Michael Dresser mdresser@baltsun.com twitter.com/michaeltdr­esser

A bill that would allow judges to admit evidence of other, similar sex offenses by a suspect accused of rape is poised to pass the Maryland Senate and receive a committee vote in the House of Delegates.

The Senate gave the legislatio­n preliminar­y approval Wednesday and is expected to pass it by the end of the week. It would then go to the House Judiciary Committee, which is expected to take a long-awaited vote on the measure.

Committee Chairman Joseph F. Vallario Jr. told The Baltimore Sun that he intends to advance the House version of the bill before a critical Monday deadline.

The progress pleased Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby, one of the bill’s chief advocates.

Previous versions of the bill have failed in the House committee. This year, Mosby said, “the dynamics are different.”

“In the year of the #MeToo and #TimesUp movement, time’s up on serial rapists getting away with it,” Mosby said.

Republican Gov. Larry Hogan also supports the legislatio­n.

It would give prosecutor­s a new tool for trying cases against serial sex offenders by letting them present to juries evidence of past incidents not directly related to defendants’ pending charges. Such evidence is not admissible now.

Mosby said the measure would help level the playing field between victims and defendants while still protecting the rights of the accused.

“The constituti­onal safeguards that are in place in the legislatio­n are unparallel­ed,” she said.

Ricardo A. Flores, government relations director for the Office of the Public Defender, said he’d rather not see the legislatur­e act on the legislatio­n. He said the proper place for discussing such changes is in the Rules Committee of the Court of Appeals. But he said the Senate bill had been “significan­tly improved” since he testified against it early in the session.

Mosby has said her support for the legislatio­n was driven in part by the case of Nelson Bernard Clifford, the Baltimore man who was acquitted in four separate rape cases after claiming his alleged victims in each consented to have sex with him. The juries in each of those trials never heard about the other alleged incidents.

In 2015, Mosby’s office won a conviction of Clifford of third-degree sexual assault charges and theft in a fifth case. Prosecutor­s said he broke into a woman’s home in the Barclay neighborho­od and assaulted her. With a previous sexual assault conviction on his record, he received a 30-year prison sentence.

Maryland law currently allows criminal cases to proceed solely on evidence related to the specific charges. It does not allow evidence of past offenses to be admitted.

The legislatio­n would create an exception to that rule in cases in which the victim is a child or when the defendant’s defense is that the act was consensual.

Backers say the current law reduces the number of cases in which suspects have shown a pattern of behavior to “he said, she said” disputes around single incidents.

State Sen. James Brochin, the bill’s Senate sponsor, said recent high-profile cases demonstrat­e the need for the legislatio­n. The Baltimore County Democrat pointed to Dr. Larry Nassar, the team doctor of the U.S. women’s national gymnastics team who was accused of molesting more than 250 girls and women over more than 20 years. He was convicted of 10 charges of sexual assault this year and sent to prison for what is expected to be the rest of his life.

“This is the Nassar case. This is the Bill Cosby case,” Brochin said. “This is giving victims a chance to have their say in court so the jury and a judge learns the whole story.”

Brochin said the bill would give defense attorneys ample opportunit­y to ask judges to exclude evidence of other alleged assaults by giving them 90 days to raise objections. Prosecutor­s would have to present “clear and convincing evidence” that the other behavior is relevant, and that its value as evidence outweighs its prejudicia­l impact on judges or juries.

At least 37 states and the federal government allow the admission of evidence of a pattern of behavior in sexual assault cases, Brochin said.

State Sen. Bobby Zirkin, the chairman of the Judicial Proceeding­s Committee, said the Senate has sent the proposal to the House in various forms over the years only to see it bottled up in the Judiciary Committee.

The Baltimore County Democrat said he’s basing this year’s bill on the legal doctrine of chances, which allows prosecutor­s to admit evidence of previous actions if they can show that it is extremely unlikely that those behaviors were not part of a pattern.

“A number of states have this position,” Zirkin said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States