Baltimore Sun

FBI report finds Comey ‘insubordin­ate’ in email probe

-

WASHINGTON — In a stinging rebuke, the Justice Department watchdog declared Thursday that former FBI Director James Comey was “insubordin­ate” in his handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigat­ion in the explosive final months of the 2016 presidenti­al campaign. But it also found that there was no evidence that Comey’s or the department’s final conclusion­s were motivated by political bias toward either candidate.

President Donald Trump and his supporters had looked to the much-anticipate­d report to provide a fresh line of attack against Comey and the FBI as Trump claims that a politicall­y tainted bureau tried to undermine his campaign and — through the later Russia investigat­ion — his presidency. Clinton and her supporters, on the other hand, have James Comey

long complained that she was the one whose election chances were torpedoed by Comey’s investigat­ion announceme­nts about her email practices, in the summer and then shortly before the election.

Comey, whom Trump fired shortly after taking office, bore the brunt of much criticism in the report, but not for political favoritism.

The inspector general concluded that the FBI director, who announced in the summer of 2016 that Clinton had been “ex- tremely careless” with classified material but would not be charged with any crime, departed from normal Justice Department protocol numerous times. But it also said, “We found no evidence that the conclusion­s by the prosecutor­s were affected by bias or other improper considerat­ions; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutor­s’ assessment of the facts, the law and past department practice.”

The conclusion­s were contained in a 500-page report that documents in painstakin­g detail one of the most consequent­ial investigat­ions in modern FBI history and reveals how the bureau came to be entangled in the 2016 presidenti­al election.

Trump supporters focused on the report’s recounting of anti-Trump text messages from two FBI officials who worked the Clinton probe and later the Russia case, including one in which an agent says, “We’ll stop it” with regard to a possible Trump victory. The report suggests that text from Peter Strzok, who was later dropped from Mueller’s team, “implies a willingnes­s to take official action to impact the presidenti­al candidate’s electoral prospects.”

Spokeswoma­n Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the report “reaffirmed the president’s suspicions about Comey’s conduct.” But the report rejects the Trump talking point that the FBI favored Clinton over him and that its leaders were driven by politics. It also does not second-guess the FBI’s conclusion that Clinton should not have been prosecuted.

The report underscore­s efforts by senior FBI and Justice Department leaders in the final stages of the presidenti­al race to juggle developmen­ts in the Clinton investigat­ion — she had used private email for some government business while secretary of state — with a separate probe into potential coordinati­on between the Trump campaign and Russia that was diverting FBI resources and attention. The Russia investigat­ion was unknown at the time to the public.

The FBI, in a statement accompanyi­ng the report, accepted the conclusion that Comey broke from protocol and that errors in judgment by staff damaged the bureau’s reputation. Comey wrote an opinion piece for The New York Times in which he said he disagreed with some conclusion­s but respected the watchdog’s work.

Trump is certain to use the report’s harsh assessment of FBI actions to try to validate his firing of Comey last year, an act central to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion into whether the president sought to obstruct justice. The White House cited as the original rationale for Comey’s firing his handling of the Clinton investigat­ion, even though Trump days later said he was thinking of “this Russia thing.”

On the other side, even absent political bias, the report alleges a long series of misjudgmen­ts that Democrats will likely use to support their belief that Clinton was wronged by the FBI. The watchdog faults Comey for his July 5, 2016, news conference at which he disclosed his recommenda­tion against bringing charges in the email investigat­ion. Cases that end without charges are rarely discussed publicly. And Comey did not reveal to Attorney General Loretta Lynch his plans to make an announceme­nt.

In one final irony, the report noted that Comey, and other officials, had used personal emails improperly to conduct FBI business even as they were investigat­ing Clinton’s email practices. Clinton retweeted that news with a concise reaction: “But my emails.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States