Baltimore Sun

U.S. attacks contracept­ion, abortion

- By Robert Walker oppose Robert Walker (info@population­institute.org) is the president of the Population Institute, a Washington-based nonprofit promoting family planning and the reproducti­ve health of women at home and abroad.

Last month, voters in Ireland voted by a nearly 2-1 margin to make abortion legal, but the right to an abortion in the United States is under growing siege.

The implementa­tion of Iowa’s recently passed “heartbeat law,” which bans most abortions and is one of the most restrictiv­e state abortion laws in the country, was temporaril­y stayed by a judge this month, though less onerous restrictio­ns in other states are forcing the closure of dozens of abortion clinics. In several states today only one abortion clinic remains open. Abortion access in the U.S. can no longer be taken for granted.

But it’s not just abortion rights that are under siege; access to contracept­ion is also imperiled. The Trump administra­tion’s recently unveiled “domestic gag rule,” as its popularly known, while technicall­y aimed at curbing abortion, imperils the future of hundreds of Title X-supported family planning clinics providing contracept­ive services to low-income households.

The proposed rule would deny Title X funding to Planned Parenthood and other family planning providers if they have any affiliates offering abortion services. What’s at stake here is the future viability of a family planning program that, over the past half-century, has helped tens of millions of women gain access to contracept­ion and other preventive health care services. At present, Title X supports over 4,000 clinics serving more than 3 million women a year.

The proposed rule would also prohibit Title X family planning clinics from referring patients to any medical care provider offering abortion services, unless the patient specifical­ly requests abortion services.

Even more ominously, the Trump administra­tion wants to shift Title X funding away from traditiona­l family planning clinics to “crisis pregnancy centers” that offer neither abortion services nor modern methods of contracept­ion. Such a shift in funding and focus would undermine the whole rationale behind the creation of Title X, effectivel­y denying low-income women access to family planning services and informatio­n.

Every woman should have access to contracept­ive services and counseling informatio­n from a health care provider she trusts, whether it is Planned Parenthood or another provider. When women are denied that access, the rate of unintended pregnancy goes up, and that leads to more abortions, not fewer. At the same time, denying access to reproducti­ve health care providers will accelerate an already alarming rise in the number of sexually transmitte­d diseases.

Last year, by executive action, Mr. Trump re-imposed and expanded the “gobal gag rule” that was first imposed by Ronald Reagan in 1984. Mr. Trump’s action requires foreign health care providers receiving U.S. funding in developing countries to certify that they do not advocate for, or refer patients to, abortion services. The practical effect of that rule is reduced access to the family planning services that can help women in developing countries prevent unplanned pregnancie­s — not fewer abortions.

Also last year, the Trump administra­tion terminated all funding for the United Nation’s Population Fund, a major supplier of contracept­ive services to women in the developing world, and it sought, unsuccessf­ully, to eliminate all bilateral funding for family planning programs serving women in developing countries.

This year, in United Nations deliberati­ons, Trump administra­tion appointees from the State Department and Health and Human Services sought to delete all references to contracept­ion and sex education in a U.N. declaratio­n on the rights of women.

As a practical matter, this administra­tion is doing everything in its power to reduce or eliminate support for contracept­ion, at home and abroad. Having failed to in its attempt to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which has significan­tly expanded contracept­ive coverage, the administra­tion has tried to undermine the so-called “contracept­ive mandate” by giving employers and insurers the power, for any moral or religious reason, to drop contracept­ive coverage from their insurance plans. In December of last year, a federal court in California temporaril­y blocked that proposed regulatory change, but the legal battle over the contracept­ive mandate is far from over.

These myriad attacks on contracept­ion do not reflect the will of Congress, which continues to appropriat­e funds for Title X, or the views of the American public, as a recent opinion poll indicates that 73 percent of Americans a policy that would make it illegal for health care providers that receive federal funding to refer or counsel womenabout the option of abortion. What they do reflect is an administra­tion more interested in pleasing its narrow political base than serving the reproducti­ve health care needs of women.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States