Baltimore Sun

Last votes in Balto. County primary being tallied today

Dems’ executive nominee could be known tonight

- By Pamela Wood

More than a week after the Democratic primary election for Baltimore County executive, there is still no winner — but officials say there could be one by this evening.

The last votes in the contest to be counted — about 1,300 provisiona­l ballots cast by Democrats and 900 absentee ballots from both parties — are to be tallied today.

The three-candidate race hangs in the balance. After early voting, Election Day and the first round of an absentee canvass, former state Del. Johnny Olszewski Jr. holds a 42-vote lead over state Sen Jim Brochin. County Councilwom­an Vicki Almond is third, 1,059 votes behind Olszewski.

The winner of the Democratic primary will face Republican nominee Al Redmer Jr., who defeated Del. Patrick L. McDonough in the GOP primary last week.

The Democratic provisiona­l ballots are to be counted starting at 3 p.m. today.

County elections director Katie Brown told the campaigns Thursday that staff has recommende­d rejecting some Democratic provisiona­l ballots.

Ballots can be rejected because they were cast by someone who was not registered to vote, who voted on the wrong party’s ballot, who has already voted by absentee or early ballot, or who did not sign a provisiona­l ballot applicatio­n.

Elections officials are recommendi­ng that about 1,300 provisiona­l ballots from Democrats be accepted.

Typically, staff makes recommenda­tions and the votes are tallied without much fanfare. But the intense interest from the campaigns led to an unusual setup Thursday afternoon.

Representa­tives from each campaign sat at a long table in the Hunt Valley elections office as Brown explained the process. Plastic tablecloth­s were hung across the room’s windows so observers — including reporters and other campaign staff — would be blocked from seeing private voter data shown on a screen for the campaign representa­tives to review.

“We’re really making an effort to make this a transparen­t process, to give as much openness and inclusiven­ess and participat­ion by everyone interested, everyone who has a stake in this,” said Andrew Bailey, attorney for the county elections board.

In evaluating the ballots, elections officials referred to the state elections database and a Motor Vehicle Administra­tion database in reviewing provisiona­l ballots. State officials announced shortly before the primary that the informatio­n of tens of thousands of Marylander­s who made updates to their voter registrati­on through the Motor Vehicle Administra­tion was not sent on to elections officials. Those Marylander­s were directed to cast provisiona­l ballots.

Officials said a small number of Baltimore County voters were affected by the glitch.

None of the Democratic candidates was present as their teams were briefed by elections officials on how the provisiona­l ballots were evaluated. But their campaign representa­tives said they were satisfied with the way the provisiona­l ballots were handled.

“Going into the counts tomorrow, after this review, I have 1,000 percent confidence that they are going to count every vote,” said Tucker Cavanagh, campaign manager for Olszewski.

Tim Hodge, an attorney for Brochin’s campaign, said he had wanted elections officials to count the provisiona­l ballots Thursday afternoon. He said the Olszewski team slowed the process by insisting that elections officials explain their rationale for accepting or rejecting ballots. Cavanagh said there was no delay. “We’ve been saying from the beginning that every vote needs to count, and we’ve got to make sure that happens, so we emphasize accuracy over expediency,” he said. “And it looks like we’re now going to finish on schedule, so there was no change.”

Almond has the most ground to make up, but her campaign was optimistic.

“We are confident in the integrity of the Board of Elections’ process,” campaign manager Mandee Heinl said in a statement. “As we head into final tallies, we are humbled by the support we’ve received for a favorable outcome.”

The campaigns are waiting to see not only who emerges on top, but how close the margin is. If less than 0.1 percent of votes separates the winner from the losing candidates, the state would pay for the cost of a potential recount. If the margin is larger, a candidate may petition for a recount, but would have to pay for it.

Nearly 83,000 Democratic votes have been counted, which would make the 0.1 percent figure about 83 votes or fewer.

The Olszewski campaign sent a fundraisin­g email to supporters Thursday.

“We have a team on site at the Board of Elections today observing — and protecting — the integrity of the election process,” Olszewski wrote in the solicitati­on.

Elections judges started Thursday with Republican provisiona­l ballots. They accepted 217 in full and 86 in part — meaning that votes for some races were counted, but not for others.

For example, some voters’ ballots for countywide and statewide races were counted, but their votes for local offices were not counted if they voted in the wrong district.

The 1,300 Democratic provisiona­l ballots to be counted today will also be accepted in full or in part.

Even though the Republican votes were tallied, the results will not be made public until all of the Democratic provisiona­l ballots are counted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States