Baltimore Sun

Trump’s fake war on true news

- By Jules Witcover Jules Witcover is a syndicated columnist and former longtime writer for The Baltimore Sun. His latest book is “The American Vice Presidency: From Irrelevanc­e to Power” (Smithsonia­n Books). His email is juleswitco­ver@comcast.net.

In one of President Donald Trump’s latest exhortatio­ns to his faithful supporters, he told them: “Don’t believe the crap you see from these people, the fake news,” adding: “Just remember: What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”

He was referring to mainstream journalism outlets not on the right wing, notably cable television platforms such as CNN and MSNBC and newspapers such as The NewYork Times and The Washington Post, which are his most avid critics and fact checkers.

They and some other less liberal news organizati­ons, like The Wall Street Journal, have demonstrab­ly been truth police, holding Mr. Trump to a standard of verificati­on to which he frequently and even regularly falls miles short.

With typical brashness, the president himself is a chief practition­er and purveyor of fake news, even to the point of peddling a transparen­tly fictional “clarificat­ion” of his alarming statement at the recent Helsinki summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Standing next to Mr. Putin in Helsinki, Mr. Trump said, “I don’t see any reason why it would be” Russia involved in the 2016 elections meddling. A day later in Washington, Mr. Trump averred he meant say “wouldn’t be” — a claim as shocking as it was laughable.

Mr. Trump’s subsequent advice at a campaign-like rally of Trump worshipper­s to boycott or at least disbelieve what they see or hear on the mainstream news media very likely was a case of preaching to the choir. Many if not most of his true believers routinely depend, as he regularly does, on Trump-friendly Fox News, whose most prominent commentato­rs, like his fawning pal Sean Hannity, are conspicuou­sly in the president’s pocket.

Just the other day, major newspapers editoriall­y critical of the president reported that on Air Force One, CNN was playing on first lady Melania Trump’s television set, to her husband’s ire. If true, it was a sign of wifely independen­ce and a breach of the commonplac­e staff loyalty to conservati­ve news media in Trump World.

Political independen­ce and absence of bias have long been conceits of the Fourth Estate, as the news business somewhat self-importantl­y refers to itself, as if to elevate itself to the realm of the three branches of American government. But many, particular­ly conservati­ves, contend otherwise.

For reporters, covering the political beat is generally regarded a prize assignment. Ideally, they are expected to leave their personal political views at the door, except for opinion writers and commentato­rs, who inevitably are known as much for their leanings as for their smoothness of delivery, or lack thereof.

But a press card is more than something their movie impersonat­ors stick in their fedoras. It a constituti­onal protection under the First Amendment and usually one stoutly defended by members of all political parties.

Donald Trump is hardly the first major American political figure to declare war on mainstream journalism. In our time, the likes of Huey Long, Joe McCarthy, George Wallace, Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew all were known and even gained wide public support for their tussles with the press.

Agnew and one of his favorite speechwrit­ers, William Safire — later a columnist for the New York Times — warmed conservati­ves’ hearts and earned some disdain in the press by labeling reporters “nattering nabobs of negativism.” But seldom, until Mr. Trump, has a major American politician been successful in generating wide public contempt and disfavor for what one of them used to call “squalid little men with dirty fingernail­s scribbling in their notebooks.”

In the era of Mr. Trump, men and women herded into press sections by campaign operatives are frequently subjected to ugly and profane verbal abuse as “enemies of the people.” All they are guilty of is conveying to the public at large, contrary to Mr. Trump’s allegation­s, “what they’re seeing and what’s happening.”

But most of today’s reporters have developed thick skin, and in the service of the public’s right to know they will continue to report on the president’s contemptuo­us serial lying.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States