Baltimore Sun

Border deal moves closer

Trump unhappy with compromise, but expected to sign it

- By Jill Colvin, Alan Fram and Catherine Lucey

WASHINGTON — Even before seeing a final deal or agreeing to seal it, President Donald Trump labored on Wednesday to frame the congressio­nal agreement on border security as a political win, never mind that it contains only a fraction of the billions for a “great, powerful wall” that he has been demanding for months.

Trump is expected to grudgingly accept the agreement, which would avert another government shutdown and give him what Republican­s have been describing as a “down payment” on his signature campaign pledge.

He said Wednesday that he’s still waiting on lawmakers to present him with final legislativ­e language before making a decision. But he’s not waiting to declare victory, contending at the White House on Wednesday that a wall “is being built as we speak.”

Work on a first barrier extension — 14 miles in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley — starts this month, approved by Congress a year ago along with money to renovate and strengthen some existing fencing. But that’s a far cry from the vast wall he promised during his campaign that would “go up so fast your head will spin.”

Sounding as if he was again in campaign mode, he told a law enforcemen­t group Wednesday, “It’s going to be a great, powerful wall. The wall is very, very on its way.” He added, “You are going to have to be in extremely good shape to get over this one. They would be able to climb Mount Everest a lot easier, I think.”

White House officials cautioned that they had yet to see final legislativ­e language,

NEWS PG 11

which was still being worked out Wednesday, and Trump has a history of balking at deals after signaling he was on board. But barring any major changes or late additions, he was expected to acquiesce, according to White House officials and other Republican­s close to the White House who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

Trump and his aides have also signaled that he is preparing to use executive action to try to secure additional money for the wall by tapping into existing federal dollars without any congressio­nal sign-off so he can show supporters he’s continuing to fight. That could lead to resistance in Congress or federal court.

But assuming there are no surprises in the final text, “I think he’s going to sign it,” conservati­ve Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., a close ally of the president, said Wednesday. He warned, though, that “it would be political suicide” if Trump signed the deal and then failed to take action to secure additional funding for the wall using his executive powers.

Swallowing the deal would mark a major concession by Trump, who has spent months insisting that the situation at the southern border represents a national security crisis that demands an impregnabl­e wall. He also had insisted he would accept nothing less than $5.7 billion for the barrier — a demand that forced the 35-day partial shutdown that left hundreds of thousands of federal workers without paychecks and Republican­s taking the brunt of the blame. There is no appetite to repeat the situation.

The tentative deal lawmakers reached this week would provide less than $1.4 billion for border barriers while keeping the government funded through the end of September.

In private conversati­ons, Trump has complained, calling the committee members poor negotiator­s, said a person familiar with the conversati­ons who was not authorized to speak publicly. He has also made clear that he wanted more money for the wall and has expressed concern the plan is being framed as a defeat for him in the news media.

There is also little doubt the deal will pass Congress, barring 11th-hour surprises, with “no” votes most likely coming from liberal Democrats and conservati­ve Republican­s.

At a Cabinet meeting Tuesday, Trump said he wasn’t “thrilled” or happy with the deal, but made clear that, if he does sign the legislatio­n, he is strongly considerin­g supplement­ing it by moving money from what he described as less important areas of government.

The White House has long been laying the groundwork for Trump to use executive action to bypass Congress and divert money into wall constructi­on. He could declare a national emergency or invoke other executive authority to tap funds including money set aside for military constructi­on, disaster relief and counterdru­g efforts.

Democrats and Republican­s on the Hill were trying on Wednesday to put the final touches on the legislativ­e text, while working through several snags, including whether to include a simple extension of the Violence Against Women Act as Senate Republican­s want or move a new, longerterm bill separately, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is pushing.

Democrats were also pressing to try to make sure employees of federal contractor­s receive back pay for wages lost during the last shutdown — something Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said was a no-go for the president. “I guess federal contractor­s are different in his view than federal employees,” Blunt said. The continued haggling meant a House vote won’t come before tonight at the earliest.

Trump kept his cards close, telling reporters he would be taking “a very serious look” at the final text once the White House receives it and watching for any “land mines.”

Still, he reiterated his aversion to another shutdown.

Lawmakers need to pass some kind of funding bill by midnight Friday to avoid another shutdown.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States