Baltimore Sun

State needs stronger restrictio­ns on what counts as renewable energy

-

The Clean Energy Jobs Act may pass the General Assembly this year. But without changes, the act won’t deliver all the clean energy it promises, and will possibly waste hundreds of millions of dollars of Maryland ratepayers’ money.

The legislatio­n calls for 14.5 percent Maryland solar energy by 2030, and as much as 10 percent offshore wind. Those are good, ambitious targets that will support Maryland jobs and clean energy. But that gets us less than halfway to CEJA’s target of 50 percent renewable energy by 2030. Where does the rest come from?

The same place it comes from today: “unbundled,” renewable energy credits. Renewable energy credits represent that renewable energy has been produced somewhere on the grid, but they are an add-on to energy, not the energy itself.

Because of Maryland’s loose restrictio­ns on what types of unbundled renewable energy credits can be counted as renewable energy, the credits often provide little more than a veneer of cleanlines­s to our regular dirty fuel sources. Buying these types of renewable energy credits doesn’t provide physical delivery of electricit­y to customers. Maryland’s electricit­y still comes overwhelmi­ngly from fossil fuels and nuclear. Instead, these credits give us the right to claim our energy is cleaner than it really is, and we pay extra for the pretense.

Defenders of the buying out-of-state unbundled renewable energy credits say the practice helps developers finance renewable energy projects, and that is good for Maryland. That may be true in some cases. However, because of Maryland’s loose restrictio­ns on what types of unbundled renewable energy credits can be counted as renewable energy, Maryland ratepayers often end up subsidizin­g either dirty energy sources or out-of-state energy sources that don’t need our subsidies.

Meanwhile, many of the sources for Maryland renewable energy credits are dirtier than fossil fuels. In 2017, highly polluting sources like trash incinerato­rs, woody biomass and black liquor (a waste product of paper mills) provided a whopping 41 percent of the renewable energy credits paid for by Maryland consumers. Most of the dirty biomass and black liquor renewable energy credits are produced by highly polluting industrial operations in states such as Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina and Ohio, and are owned and operated by corporatio­ns worth billions of dollars. Maryland residents and businesses should not pay higher electricit­y bills to subsidize wealthy, out-of-state corporate polluters in the name of clean energy.

The Clean Energy Jobs Act represents a big commitment for Maryland. Given the financial strain many Maryland residents face and our current climate emergency, the General Assembly should fix the legislatio­n so that Maryland residents and businesses can be confident they are paying for real clean energy in their electric bills, or subsidizin­g projects that provide real economic and climate benefits for our state.

Tim Whitehouse

The writer is executive director of Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibi­lity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States