Baltimore Sun

Crossroads ebbs closer to replace stadium

- By Stephen Whyno

RICHMOND, Va. — FedEx Field is just 22 years old but a concrete relic of stadiums past, with the clock ticking on its status as an NFL building.

The Washington Redskins’ training camp home away from home is only 6 years old and yet it’s also on borrowed time.

On the field, Washington is three years removed from its last playoff appearance, 27 from the Super Bowl glory years and has missed the postseason 21 times in that span. Off the field, the team’s future is a wide-open book with numerous possibilit­ies on where it will play home games and hold training camp.

While roster moves like selecting quarterbac­k Dwayne Haskins in the first round will affect wins and losses, the organizati­on is in the midst of stadium negotiatio­ns that will determine the longterm direction of the franchise.

“As you can see with the teams that have done new stadiums, it’s for the next generation,” president Bruce Allen said in a sit-down interview with the Associated Press. “A stadium location and building is for the next 40 years — where you’re going to be and the home. It’s taken into account where technology is going and where people want to work, live and play in the same location. It’s critical. It’s critical for the way you’re going to present your team to your fans and how accessible you can be for your fans.”

Talks are ongoing with Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia on a new stadium that would replace FedEx Field when its lease expires in 2027. Sites near Dulles Internatio­nal Airport in Virginia, National Harbor in Maryland and RFK Stadium in D.C. are the leading candidates, though Allen was unwilling to publicly divulge who’s likely to win the bidding process.

“There is dialogue each week and different concepts and different. ideas,” Allen said. “So it’s exciting: Utilizing [owner Dan Snyder’s] vision for what the new era is going to look like in stadiums. We have beautiful models for all of them.”

It probably won’t include the infamous moat that generated a buzz three years ago. But the new facility that should rival the Dallas Cowboys’ “Jerry World” will be a significan­t upgrade over FedEx Field, which lacks charm, convenienc­e and many modern amenities and was ranked 30th of 32 teams by Stadium Journey.

In 2017, then-Redskins quarterbac­k Kirk Cousins said on FM-106.7 in Washington that the FedEx Field grass “probably doesn’t look like a profession­al NFL field should.” The team has worked to shore that up since, but technologi­cal advancemen­ts should make its new stadium a far better playing surface.

The fields at the training camp facility in Richmond have provided almost ideal conditions since opening in 2013. All of it came at a cost that makes the continuati­on of Redskins camp in Virginia’s state capital beyond 2020 unlikely.

It cost $10 million to build as part of a $40 million agreement with the city, and the Redskins spend copious amounts of money each year to move their operations down I-95 from their regular facility in Ashburn, Virginia. The Redskins are one of 10 teams to still go away for training camp.

“We think it’s great for camaraderi­e with the players,” Allen said. “It gives an ability to have a complete focus on football without the distractio­ns of being at home. We still feel that way.”

The team says Richmond has received more from the Redskins’ charitable efforts, fans, media and visiting teams than it has contribute­d. Virginia Commonweal­th University in January appraised the facility to be worth $17 million.

But the training facility and Redskins’ presence each summer hasn’t been the financial boon to Richmond that the city expected. VCU estimated the city will fall $4 million short of costs by the end of the deal next year and wouldn’t break even until 2022 or 2023.

Players seem to like getting away, especially Richmond native Morgan Moses, who gets to have his family at camp and sees benefits beyond football.

“It’s a great deal to the city just having this,” Washington’s starting right tackle said. “It gives people something to do, man. It gets a lot of people out of trouble in the Richmond area. It’s a beautiful setup here. To see these people come out every day, it’s a great deal, man. We could be in Ashburn and nobody around.”

Allen said in a recent radio interview the team would like to have a stadium agreement done within the next year.

Three years before the potential opening date is the real deadline to make sure constructi­on can be completed on a complex, that would include a full-time practice facility, too.

Before a site is selected, there will be plenty of debate about whether the expanse of land by Dulles or National Harbor or the nostalgia and convenienc­e of RFK Stadium should be the Redskins’ future home.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States