Baltimore Sun

Taxes shouldn’t pay for religious indoctrina­tion

-

No taxpayer should be forced to pay for another’s religious education. That’s why the current fundamenta­list-backed push to funnel public money to private, predominan­tly religious institutio­ns does a disservice to students, educators, families and the public school system.

Unlike public schools, private schools accepting these vouchers are free to discrimina­te against potential and current students based on bigotry disguised as, or rooted in, religious faith. In addition to violating people’s religious liberty, prioritizi­ng access to private school vouchers runs entirely counter to evidence-based models of student success and conflicts with the core mission of the U.S. Department of Education.

In Washington, D.C., the voucher program has no effect on student or parental satisfacti­on, and students using vouchers are less likely to have access to vital educationa­l services, including special education support and ESL programs.

Neal McClusky’s recent piece is misleading and inaccurate (“Md. case reveals religious discrimina­tion in education,” Aug. 20).

It’s not religious discrimina­tion when government refuses to use public funds for religious indoctrina­tion. And in no way does funding scientific, secular education discrimina­te against religion — it simply protects our students from discrimina­tion and ensures equal educationa­l access for all.

Roy Speckhardt

The writer is executive director of the American Humanist Associatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States