Baltimore Sun

Striped bass regulation­s place burden on recreation­al anglers

- By Jeff Crane, Chris Edmonston and Glenn Hughes

Maryland is home for each of us. We know firsthand that the state has some of the best striped bass fishing in the country, and our local economy benefits annually with nearly $820 million added to our Gross Domestic Product from striped bass alone. However, both man-made and environmen­tal challenges have hampered the striped bass population from Maine to North Carolina, and it is time to act.

On Oct. 30, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC), the interstate body charged with jointly managing the Atlantic coast’s shared migratory fishery resources, voted to reduce striped bass removals by 18% in the recreation­al and commercial fisheries. States must submit their plans by Nov. 29, detailing how they will achieve the 18% reduction in 2020 if they are not using the preferred measures urged by ASMFC.

America’s sportfishi­ng and boating community is on record in favor of the reduction, recognizin­g that tough management decisions must be made for the benefit of our shared public resources. ASMFC encouraged all states to share the reductions evenly between the commercial and recreation­al sectors, and Maryland should not be the exception.

Maryland’s recreation­al anglers stand ready to work with state leaders to conserve and rebuild the iconic striped bass fishery.

However, Maryland’s current proposal places the vast majority of the burden on the recreation­al fishery and may not contain measures likely to bring on-thewater results and turn the tide for the striped bass population. We are strong supporters of state management of fishery resources, but heavy-handed regulation­s on one sector over the other without a thorough, transparen­t process is not a fair accounting of the contributi­ons the recreation­al fishing and boating industry brings to the state of Maryland.

In 2016, the Maryland recreation­al striped bass fishery (private anglers and charter boats) supported 10,193 jobs and contribute­d $802 million to state GDP. That’s 97% of the economic value of the fishery. Maryland anglers — all 744,236 of us — care about resource conservati­on. Furthermor­e, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources receives millions of dollars annually from fishing license sales as well as the Sport Fish Restoratio­n and Boating Trust Fund, which is fueled by excise taxes paid on recreation­al fishing equipment and motorboat fuel taxes. Within the state, these funds are used for natural resource management, education programs and conservati­on efforts benefiting species like striped bass.

Good stewardshi­p of public fishery resources uses many tools in the fishery management toolbox. Maryland anglers are already helping striped bass population­s by their use of circle hooks. ASMFC voted to require anglers to use circle hooks when fishing with bait beginning in 2021. The effectiven­ess of circle hooks as a conservati­on measure has been proven through more than a decade of mandatory use in the Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery because they are designed to hook fish in the mouth and avoid “gut hooking.” We encourage continuity in this gear regulation.

Businesses dependent on recreation­al fishing can better prepare for 2020 and beyond with certainty in regulation­s. Now is the time for a fair, deliberate, inclusive process. Our hope is that our state leaders will step back, take a methodical and transparen­t approach, and invite stakeholde­rs to the table to let some sunshine into this process.

Conservati­on of Maryland’s official state fish is important to local anglers like us and the many small businesses that rely on recreation­al fishing in our great state.

 ?? BALTIMORE SUN FILE PHOTO ?? Maryland recreation­al anglers say the onus to conserve and rebuild the iconic striped bass fishery has been placed on them through heavy-handed regulation­s.
BALTIMORE SUN FILE PHOTO Maryland recreation­al anglers say the onus to conserve and rebuild the iconic striped bass fishery has been placed on them through heavy-handed regulation­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States