Baltimore Sun

Fed judge considerin­g bid to stop release of Bolton’s book

- By Eric Tucker

WASHINGTON — Former national security adviser John Bolton created a “mess” of his own making by moving to publish his book without receiving final authorizat­ion that the manuscript was free of classified informatio­n, Trump administra­tion lawyers argued Friday in urging a judge to block the book’s release.

But a lawyer for Bolton described the government’s request as surreal and impractica­l, particular­ly since copies of the book have already been released to leading news media organizati­ons and have received substantia­l publicity.

U.S. District Judge Royce

Lamberth did not immediatel­y rule, saying he wants to review additional informatio­n in a case that raises core First Amendment and national security concerns.

He pressed both sides on their positions, making it clear he was troubled by the government’s contention that Bolton had bailed prematurel­y on the prepublica­tion review process designed to protect against the disclosure of classified informatio­n. But he also asked the Justice Department what he was supposed to do since “the horse seems to be out of the barn” now that copies of the book have been distribute­d.

Justice Department attorney David Morrell said Bolton should not be rewarded for a problem that he himself had created.

“He has flung the barnyard doors open. He has let the horses out, and now he looks at us collective­ly and says, ‘What are you going to do about it?’ ” Morrell said.

The Justice Department sued to halt next week’s release of “The Room Where it Happened,” insisting that the book contained classified informatio­n that could damage national security and that Bolton had failed to complete a prepublica­tion review process.

Bolton’s lawyers argued that he had labored painstakin­gly for months with the White House to address concerns over classified informatio­n. In late April, Ellen Knight, the career official with whom he had worked most closely and who had done a line-by-line edit, notified him that she had completed her revisions and that the revised manuscript did not contain classified informatio­n.

But another White House official soon after embarked on an additional review and identified material that he said was classified, prompting the administra­tion to warn Bolton against publicatio­n.

That late- stage endround around Knight’s judgment by a political appointee was troubling, said Bolton attorney Chuck Cooper.

“The question becomes: Is she an authorized official? Well, there’s no doubt that she is. Did she confirm that the informatio­n is unclassifi­ed? There’s no dispute by the government that she did,” he added.

Bolton’s lawyers have argued that the White House assertions of classified material are a pretext to censor him over a book the administra­tion simply finds unflatteri­ng.

“If the First Amendment stands for anything, it is that the Government does not have the power to clasp its hand over the mouth of a citizen attempting to speak on a matter of great public import,” they wrote in a court filing.

The book, due out Tuesday, depicts a president whose foreign policy objectives were inexorably linked to his own political gain. It recounts how Trump “pleaded” with Chinese leader Xi Jinping during a 2019 summit to help his reelection prospects, and how he linked the supply of military assistance to Ukraine to the country’s willingnes­s to conduct politicall­y charged investigat­ions into Joe Biden — allegation­s that were at the heart of an impeachmen­t trial that ended with the president’s acquittal in February.

Trump on Thursday called the book a “compilatio­n of lies and made up stories” intended to make him look bad.

Other administra­tion officials who figure prominentl­y in the book, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, denied comments or actions that were attributed to them and joined the president in condemning the book.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States