Baltimore Sun

Navy upholds firing of carrier captain amid viral outbreak

- By Lolita C. Baldor and Robert Burns

WASHINGTON — In a stunning reversal, the Navy has upheld the firing of the aircraft carrier captain who urged faster action to protect his crew from a coronaviru­s outbreak, according to a U.S. official familiar with the report.

The official said the Navy also extended the blame for the ship’s pandemic crisis, delaying the promotion of the one-star admiral who was also onboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt — concluding both men made serious errors in judgment.

The spread of the coronaviru­s aboard the carrier while on deployment in the Pacific in March exploded into one of the biggest military leadership crises of recent years. More than 1,000 members of the crew eventually became infected, and one sailor died. The ship was sidelined for weeks at Guam but recently returned to duty.

The decision by Adm. Mike Gilday, the chief of naval operations, to hold both Capt. Brett Crozier and his boss, Rear Adm. Stuart Baker, accountabl­e is a confirmati­on of concerns expressed by top Pentagon officials who demanded a deeper investigat­ion last month when the initial probe recommende­d Crozier’s reinstatem­ent as the ship’s captain. The official described the findings on condition of anonymity to discuss a report not yet made public.

The investigat­ion, done by Adm. Robert Burke and endorsed Friday by Gilday, defends the abrupt turnaround on Crozier saying that the more detailed probe uncovered poor decisions he made that failed to stem the outbreak or properly communicat­e the escalating crisis to senior commanders. It also concludes that the ship’s slow response to the virus was not just his fault, and that Baker also failed to take decisive actions to address the problem.

Gilday’s recommenda­tions cap a drama that has engulfed the Navy for nearly three months, sidelining the carrier for 10 weeks in Guam, and setting off a dramatic series of events that led to Crozier’s dismissal, the abrupt resignatio­n of the acting Navy secretary who fired him, and the push for a broader review of the Pacific fleet’s top commanders and how they handled the virus outbreak.

Based on the findings, Crozier and Baker would be able to remain in the Navy and move on to other jobs at their current rank, but the admonishme­nts are likely careerende­rs for both men. Crozier’s firing upset the carrier’s crew, and he received an ovation as he walked off the ship.

The recommenda­tions reflect concerns expressed by Navy Secretary Kenneth Braithwait­e who told a Senate committee in early May that the service was in “rough waters” and suffering from leadership failures. Braithwait­e, whom the official said endorsed Gilday’s report, pledged to the Senate Armed Services Committee during his confirmati­on hearing that he would restore a culture of good order and discipline to the service.

In late April, after a preliminar­y review, Gilday recommende­d that Crozier be returned to command the Roosevelt. But Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pressed for a wider investigat­ion of the coronaviru­s crisis on the ship, suggesting the need for deeper scrutiny of actions and decisions by senior admirals in the Pacific, a region critical to America’s national security interests.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States