Baltimore Sun

Strict curbs ahead for Facebook advertisin­g

Platform to ban new political messaging in week before vote

- By Zen Soo

Bracing for a contentiou­s election with no immediate results and possible “civil unrest,” Facebook is enacting a host of measures to ensure its platform is not used to sow chaos and spread misinforma­tion before, during and after the presidenti­al election.

But it’s not clear the changes are enough.

The company said Thursday that it will restrict new political ads in the week before the election and remove posts that convey misinforma­tion about COVID-19 and voting. It will also attach links with official results to posts by candidates and campaigns that prematurel­y declare victory.

“This election is not going to be business as usual. We all have a responsibi­lity to protect our democracy,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a post. “That means helping people register and vote, clearing up confusion about how this election will work, and taking steps to reduce the chances of violence and unrest.”

Some activists hailed the new policies but said the onus will be on Facebook to enforce them. And others were skeptical that they’ll really make a difference.

“Voting starts in North Carolina tomorrow. Election Day isn’t in two months, it’s tomorrow and every day after. Which means voters in that state and many others that vote early will be subject to months of dishonest ads on Facebook’s platform,” said Shaunna Thomas, cofounder and executive director of UltraViole­t, a women’s organizati­on critical of Facebook.

She called the announceme­nt a “PR stunt designed to distract from the fact that Facebook is the single biggest vector of dangerous misinforma­tion and voter suppressio­n campaigns in the United States.”

Siva Vaidhyanat­han, a Facebook expert at the University of Virginia, said the company again proved itself incapable of effectivel­y snuffing out dangerous misinforma­tion last week when it failed to remove postings by right-wing militia organizers urging supporters with rifles to converge on Kenosha, Wisconsin.

“Facebook’s biggest problem has always been enforcemen­t,” he said. “Even when it creates reasonable policies that seem well-meaning, it gets defeated by its own scale. So I am not optimistic that this will be terribly effective.”

Facebook and other social media companies are being scrutinize­d over how they handle misinforma­tion, given problems with President Donald Trump and other candidates posting false informatio­n and Russia’s ongoing attempts to interfere in U.S. politics.

With the nation divided, and election results potentiall­y taking days or weeks to be finalized, there could be an “increased risk of civil unrest across the country,” Zuckerberg said.

Civil rights groups said they pitched Zuckerberg and other Facebook executives to make many of the changes announced Thursday.

“These are really significan­t steps but everything is going to depend on the enforcemen­t,” said Vanita Gupta, who was head of the Obama Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and now leads the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. “I think they’re going to be tested on it pretty soon.”

In July, Trump refused to publicly commit to accepting the results of the election as he scoffed at polls that showed him lagging behind Democratic rival Joe Biden. Trump also has made false claims that the increased use of mail-in voting because of the coronaviru­s pandemic allows for voter fraud. That has raised concern over the willingnes­s of Trump and

his supporters to abide by election results.

Under the new measures, Facebook says it will prohibit politician­s and campaigns from running new election ads in the week before the election. However, they can still run existing ads and change how they are targeted. Many voters, however, are expected to vote by mail well ahead of Election Day.

Trump campaign spokeswoma­n Samantha Zager criticized the ban on new political ads, saying it would prevent Trump from defending himself on the platform in the last week of the presidenti­al campaign.

Posts with obvious misinforma­tion on voting policies and the pandemic will also be removed. Users can only forward articles to a maximum of five others on Messenger, Facebook’s messaging app. The com

pany also will work with Reuters to provide official election results and make the informatio­n available on its platform and with push notificati­ons.

After being caught offguard by Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidenti­al election, Facebook, Google, Twitter and other companies put safeguards in place to prevent it from happening again. That includes taking down posts, groups and accounts that engage in “coordinate­d inauthenti­c behavior” and strengthen­ing verificati­on procedures for political ads. Last year, Twitter banned political ads altogether.

Zuckerberg said Facebook had removed over 100 networks worldwide engaging in such interferen­ce over the last few years.

But experts and Facebook’s own employees have said the measures have not

been enough to stop the spread of misinforma­tion, including from politician­s. Internal dissent among Facebook employees might have helped influence Zuckerberg’s decision to do something, said Joan Donovan, a disinforma­tion researcher at Harvard University.

“This is a huge aboutface for Facebook in this moment because for so long they said they were unwilling to moderate political speech and now at this stage they are drawing very sharp lines and I think that’s because their company cannot survive another fouryear scandal,” she said.

Facebook had previously drawn criticism for its ads policy, which cited freedom of expression as the reason for letting politician­s like Trump post false informatio­n about voting.

 ?? KENZO TRIBOUILLA­RD/GETTY-AFP ?? Facebook and other social media companies are being scrutinize­d over how they handle misinforma­tion about the Nov. 3 election and COVID-19.
KENZO TRIBOUILLA­RD/GETTY-AFP Facebook and other social media companies are being scrutinize­d over how they handle misinforma­tion about the Nov. 3 election and COVID-19.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States